From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:55:49 -0700 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2/dlm: call dlm_lockres_put without resource spinlock In-Reply-To: <542526C3.2090302@huawei.com> References: <542526C3.2090302@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20141001155549.e64a41bbf797482eb388f65b@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:41:39 +0800 alex chen wrote: > dlm_lockres_put should be called without &res->spinlock, otherwise a > deadlock case may happen. > > spin_lock(&res->spinlock) > ... > dlm_lockres_put > ->dlm_lockres_release > ->dlm_print_one_lock_resource > ->spin_lock(&res->spinlock) > > Signed-off-by: Alex Chen > Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi > --- > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c > index 45067fa..3365839 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c > @@ -1710,9 +1710,12 @@ int dlm_master_requery_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, > BUG(); This code does a GFP_ATOMIC allocation attempt and if that fails, it goes BUG(). Guys, GFP_ATOMIC is unreliable. This isn't production quality code :(