From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:15:55 -0700 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2_iop_set/get_acl() are also called from the VFS so we must take inode lock In-Reply-To: <553004BD.9020601@oracle.com> References: <1428097580-25352-1-git-send-email-tariq.x.saeed@oracle.com> <1428097580-25352-2-git-send-email-tariq.x.saeed@oracle.com> <552F775B.6040203@oracle.com> <553004BD.9020601@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20150416211554.GM17170@wotan.suse.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:51:41AM -0700, Tariq Saeed wrote: > I have no objection to applying your suggestions and re-submitting the > patch. Mark, what is the protocol for that. Do I need to mention > that this is a re-sumit? If you're re-submitting something that hasn't gone upstream yet it's sufficient to add a 'V2' (or whatever you like) to the subject line. Also, a change log in those cases is nice. Thanks, --Mark -- Mark Fasheh