From: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test for v4.3 done
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:50:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151221135038.GA3194@laptop.ha> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56776B6B.2010208@oracle.com>
Hi Junxiao,
Thanks for your sharing, and very appreciated your efforts.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:00:59AM +0800, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have run a full ocfs2-test(single/multiple/discontig) to v4.3 mainline
> kernel. The following three issues are found. The first two are
> regression bugs.
>
> 1. https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1357
> Fix merged. Upstream commit 087ffd4eae99("jbd2: fix null committed
> data return in undo_access")
>
> 2. https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1358
> A recursive locking issue, discussing fix in ocfs2-devel.
>
> 3. https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1359
> o2hb-increase-unsteady-iterations.patch to fix this issue, merged by
> -mm tree
>
> I have setup a test env to build and auto do ocfs2 test. With it, Ocfs2
> for mainline and linux-next will be test regularly, the test status and
> bugs will be reported to ocfs2-devel. Feel free to take any bug if you
> are interested, it will be a good start point with ocfs2. Hope this can
> catch regression bugs earlier before merged by mainline.
I'm very interested in how your testing env works, could you briefly introduce
it?
>
> For the test cases, now only ocfs2-test is supported. Ltp is going to be
> merged in the future. If any other test cases or benchmark useful to
> ocfs2 test, please let me know.
Btw, recently, I did a performance testing on both ocfs2 and gfs2 using iozone. The
testing has 3 different cases:
1. local mode: ocfs2 better than gfs2
2. two files mutiple nodes
3. same file mutiple nodes, for 2 and 3 gfs2 better than ocfs2 generally
Just provide a reference here. I tried to make it as simple as possible,
leaving all formating and mount options as default, and with fixed-size file(2GB)
and buffer(4kb).
Did you or anyone ever test performance for ocfs2? maybe we can discuss further on
this topic in future;-)
Thanks,
Eric
>
> Thanks,
> Junxiao.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-21 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-21 3:00 [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test for v4.3 done Junxiao Bi
2015-12-21 13:50 ` Eric Ren [this message]
2015-12-22 2:34 ` Junxiao Bi
2015-12-22 7:39 ` Eric Ren
2016-02-16 9:54 ` Eric Ren
2016-02-17 2:15 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-02-19 3:01 ` Eric Ren
2016-02-24 1:48 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-02-24 3:30 ` Eric Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151221135038.GA3194@laptop.ha \
--to=zren@suse.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).