From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 23:50:34 -0700 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: fix recursive locking deadlock In-Reply-To: <57317B63.8060806@oracle.com> References: <1462856023-13801-1-git-send-email-junxiao.bi@oracle.com> <20160509225804.e4ba0fb054acb1d92fe3db44@linux-foundation.org> <57317B63.8060806@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20160509235034.e9c282f827648656948b2d07@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Tue, 10 May 2016 14:10:43 +0800 Junxiao Bi wrote: > On 05/10/2016 01:58 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 10 May 2016 12:53:41 +0800 Junxiao Bi wrote: > > > >> These two patches is to fix recursive locking deadlock issues. As we > >> talked with Mark before, recursive locking is not allowed in ocfs2, > >> so these two patches fixes the deadlock issue with reverting back > >> patches to avoid recursive locking. Please review. > > > > 2-3 years old so I guess it isn't a huge issue. Did you consider > > backporting into -stable kernels? > > > We'd better do that. I reproduced every one in my test env. OK, I added the cc:stable tags to the changelogs.