From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:24:33 -0700
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 16/25] vfs: make remapping to source file
 eof more explicit
In-Reply-To: <153938925737.8361.3995899966552253527.stgit@magnolia>
References: <153938912912.8361.13446310416406388958.stgit@magnolia>
	<153938925737.8361.3995899966552253527.stgit@magnolia>
Message-ID: <20181014172433.GG30673@infradead.org>
List-Id: <ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:07:37PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> Create a RFR_TO_SRC_EOF flag to explicitly declare that the caller wants
> the remap implementation to remap to the end of the source file, once
> the files are locked.

The name looks like a cat threw up on your keyboard :)

>From reading the code this seems to ask for a whole file remap, right?
Why not put that in the name to make it more descriptive?