From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:46:58 -0800 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v7 14/24] btrfs: Convert from readpages to readahead In-Reply-To: <20200220134849.GV24185@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20200219210103.32400-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200219210103.32400-15-willy@infradead.org> <20200220134849.GV24185@bombadil.infradead.org> Message-ID: <20200220154658.GA19577@infradead.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Johannes Thumshirn , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "cluster-devel@redhat.com" , "ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 05:48:49AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > btrfs: Convert from readpages to readahead > > Implement the new readahead method in btrfs. Add a readahead_page_batch() > to optimise fetching a batch of pages at once. Shouldn't this readahead_page_batch heper go into a separate patch so that it clearly stands out?