From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:43:16 -0600 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/33] Documentation fixes for Kernel 5.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20200420154316.28e42905@lwn.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Kaehlcke , Sandeep Maheswaram , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Maxime Ripard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Brugger , Yuti Amonkar , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:48:26 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Patches 1 to 5 contain changes to the documentation toolset: > > - The first 3 patches help to reduce a lot the number of reported > kernel-doc issues, by making the tool more smart. > > - Patches 4 and 5 are meant to partially address the PDF > build, with now requires Sphinx version 2.4 or upper. > > The remaining patches fix broken references detected by > this tool: > > ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check > > and address other random errors due to tags being mis-interpreted > or mis-used. > > They are independent each other, but some may depend on > the kernel-doc improvements. > > PS.: Due to the large number of C/C, I opted to keep a smaller > set of C/C at this first e-mail (only e-mails with "L:" tag from > MAINTAINERS file). OK, I've applied this set, minus #17 which was applied elsewhere. Thanks, jon