From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:38:33 +0800
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: avoid direct write if we fall back
 to buffered
In-Reply-To: <201004091027.07406.lidongyang@novell.com>
References: <201004081547.24593.lidongyang@novell.com>	<4BBE2356.4010103@oracle.com>
	<201004091027.07406.lidongyang@novell.com>
Message-ID: <4BBE9329.7030305@oracle.com>
List-Id: <ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com

Hi Dongyang,

Li Dongyang wrote:
> This is because ocfs2_file_aio_write calls ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write which 
> sets direct_io to 0 if it finds out that direct IO would extend the file. But 
> later we call __generic_file_aio_write which end's up calling 
> generic_file_direct_write because the file has O_DIRECT flag.So every time we 
> do a direct write extending the file, the inode->i_size gets inconsistent with 
> the i_size on disk because we call generic_file_direct_write, and if we do a 
> truncate after this, we will meet a bug in ocfs2_truncate_file.
yes we have O_DIRECT flag set and in __generic_file_aio_write it will 
call generic_file_direct_write first and then trigger to 
ocfs2_direct_IO. In this function we will check again and return 0. And 
_generic_file_aio_write will fall back to buffered write if the directIO 
can't write. Am I wrong somehow?

Regards,
Tao
> 
> On Friday 09 April 2010 02:41:26 Sunil Mushran wrote:
>> I cannot read the bugzilla. Now it maybe that that bz
>> cannot be made public. That's ok. But if that's the case,
>> can you explain the problem encountered. I am not qs
>> the fix... rather trying to understand why this has not
>> been reported before.
>>
>> Li Dongyang wrote:
>>> when we fall back to buffered write from direct write, we call
>>> __generic_file_aio_write but that will end up doing direct write
>>> even we are only prepared to do buffered write because the file
>>> has O_DIRECT flag set. This is a fix for
>>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591039
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/ocfs2/file.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>>>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> index de059f4..707f2a2 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> @@ -1973,18 +1973,24 @@ relock:
>>>  	/* communicate with ocfs2_dio_end_io */
>>>  	ocfs2_iocb_set_rw_locked(iocb, rw_level);
>>>
>>> -	if (direct_io) {
>>> -		ret = generic_segment_checks(iov, &nr_segs, &ocount,
>>> -					     VERIFY_READ);
>>> -		if (ret)
>>> -			goto out_dio;
>>> +	ret = generic_segment_checks(iov, &nr_segs, &ocount,
>>> +				     VERIFY_READ);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_dio;
>>>
>>> -		count = ocount;
>>> -		ret = generic_write_checks(file, ppos, &count,
>>> +	count = ocount;
>>> +	ret = generic_write_checks(file, ppos, &count,
>>>  					   S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode));
>>> -		if (ret)
>>> -			goto out_dio;
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_dio;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = file_remove_suid(file);
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		goto out_dio;
>>>
>>> +	file_update_time(file);
>>> +
>>> +	if (direct_io) {
>>>  		written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, iov, &nr_segs, *ppos,
>>>  						    ppos, count, ocount);
>>>  		if (written < 0) {
>>> @@ -1999,7 +2005,8 @@ relock:
>>>  			goto out_dio;
>>>  		}
>>>  	} else {
>>> -		written = __generic_file_aio_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs, ppos);
>>> +		written = generic_file_buffered_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs,
>>> +				*ppos, ppos, count, 0);
>>>  	}
>>>
>>>  out_dio:
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel