From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ocfs2 fix o2dlm dlm run purgelist(bug 9094491) - rev3
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:22:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C214598.2060104@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1277228012-13836-1-git-send-email-srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>
Comments inlined. Getting there. Some more cleanups.
On 06/22/2010 10:33 AM, Srinivas Eeda wrote:
> There are two problems in dlm_run_purgelist
>
> 1. If a lockres is found to be in use, dlm_run_purgelist keeps trying to purge
> the same lockres instead of trying the next lockres.
>
> 2. When a lockres is found unused, dlm_run_purgelist releases lockres spinlock
> before setting DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF and calls dlm_purge_lockres.
> spinlock is reacquired but in this window lockres can get reused. This leads
> to BUG.
>
> This patch modifies dlm_run_purgelist to skip lockres if it's in use and purge
> next lockres. It also sets DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF before releasing the
> lockres spinlock protecting it from getting reused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Eeda<srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c
> index 11a6d1f..cb74689 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c
> @@ -152,45 +152,26 @@ void dlm_lockres_calc_usage(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
> }
>
> -static int dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> +static void dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> struct dlm_lock_resource *res)
> {
> int master;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
> - if (!__dlm_lockres_unused(res)) {
> - mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: tried to purge but not unused\n",
> - dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name);
> - __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res);
> - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> - BUG();
> - }
> -
> - if (res->state& DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING) {
> - mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: Delay dropref as this lockres is "
> - "being remastered\n", dlm->name, res->lockname.len,
> - res->lockname.name);
> - /* Re-add the lockres to the end of the purge list */
> - if (!list_empty(&res->purge)) {
> - list_del_init(&res->purge);
> - list_add_tail(&res->purge,&dlm->purge_list);
> - }
> - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> - return 0;
> - }
> + assert_spin_locked(&dlm->spinlock);
> + assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock);
>
> master = (res->owner == dlm->node_num);
>
> if (!master)
> res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF;
> - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
>
> mlog(0, "purging lockres %.*s, master = %d\n", res->lockname.len,
> res->lockname.name, master);
>
> if (!master) {
> /* drop spinlock... retake below */
> + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
>
> spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
>
This can do with more cleanup.
+ assert_spin_locked(&dlm->spinlock);
+ assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock);
master = (res->owner == dlm->node_num);
- if (!master)
- res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF;
- spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
mlog(0, "purging lockres %.*s, master = %d\n", res->lockname.len,
res->lockname.name, master);
if (!master) {
+ res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF;
- /* drop spinlock... retake below */
+ spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
> @@ -208,31 +189,35 @@ static int dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: dlm_deref_lockres returned %d\n",
> dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, ret);
> spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock);
> + spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
> if (!list_empty(&res->purge)) {
> mlog(0, "removing lockres %.*s:%p from purgelist, "
> "master = %d\n", res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name,
> res, master);
> list_del_init(&res->purge);
> - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> dlm_lockres_put(res);
> dlm->purge_count--;
> - } else
> - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> + }
>
> - __dlm_unhash_lockres(res);
> + if (__dlm_lockres_unused(res))
> + __dlm_unhash_lockres(res);
> + else {
> + mlog(ML_ERROR, "found lockres %s:%.*s: in use after deref\n",
> + dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name);
> + __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res);
> + BUG();
> + }
>
Blocks that BUG should be separated if possible. Improves readability.
+ if (!__dlm_lockres_unused(res)) {
+ mlog(ML_ERROR, "found lockres %s:%.*s: in use after deref\n",
+ dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name);
+ __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res);
+ BUG();
+ }
__dlm_unhash_lockres(res);
>
> /* lockres is not in the hash now. drop the flag and wake up
> * any processes waiting in dlm_get_lock_resource. */
> if (!master) {
> - spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
> res->state&= ~DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF;
> spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> wake_up(&res->wq);
> - }
> - return 0;
> + } else
> + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
> }
>
> static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> @@ -251,17 +236,7 @@ static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> lockres = list_entry(dlm->purge_list.next,
> struct dlm_lock_resource, purge);
>
> - /* Status of the lockres *might* change so double
> - * check. If the lockres is unused, holding the dlm
> - * spinlock will prevent people from getting and more
> - * refs on it -- there's no need to keep the lockres
> - * spinlock. */
> spin_lock(&lockres->spinlock);
> - unused = __dlm_lockres_unused(lockres);
> - spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock);
> -
> - if (!unused)
> - continue;
>
> purge_jiffies = lockres->last_used +
> msecs_to_jiffies(DLM_PURGE_INTERVAL_MS);
> @@ -273,15 +248,30 @@ static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> * in tail order, we can stop at the first
> * unpurgable resource -- anyone added after
> * him will have a greater last_used value */
> + spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock);
> break;
> }
>
> + /* Status of the lockres *might* change so double
> + * check. If the lockres is unused, holding the dlm
> + * spinlock will prevent people from getting and more
> + * refs on it. */
> + unused = __dlm_lockres_unused(lockres);
> + if (!unused ||
> + (lockres->state& DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING)) {
> + mlog(0, "lockres %s:%.*s: is in use or "
> + "being remastered\n", dlm->name,
> + lockres->lockname.len, lockres->lockname.name);
> + list_move_tail(&dlm->purge_list,&lockres->purge);
> + spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> dlm_lockres_get(lockres);
>
> /* This may drop and reacquire the dlm spinlock if it
> * has to do migration. */
> - if (dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres))
> - BUG();
> + dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres);
>
> dlm_lockres_put(lockres);
>
>
This comment is dated. We don't migrate in purge_lockres.
- /* This may drop and reacquire the dlm spinlock if it
- * has to do migration. */
- if (dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres))
- BUG();
+ dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres);
dlm_lockres_put(lockres);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-22 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-22 17:33 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ocfs2 fix o2dlm dlm run purgelist(bug 9094491) - rev3 Srinivas Eeda
2010-06-22 23:22 ` Sunil Mushran [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-23 5:48 Srinivas Eeda
2010-06-23 17:00 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-06-23 17:25 ` Srinivas Eeda
2010-06-26 10:42 ` Wengang Wang
2010-07-12 18:21 ` Joel Becker
2010-07-12 22:24 ` Srinivas Eeda
2010-07-12 22:16 Srinivas Eeda
2010-07-12 22:39 ` Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C214598.2060104@oracle.com \
--to=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).