From: Xiaowei <xiaowei.hu@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Fix waiting status race condition in dlm recovery
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:52:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5010E921.40808@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEeiSHWkhD8x8nrix2+Wc1nesH8CExU6kA10nCH0J1nCwUaDtg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Sunil,
I considered your suggestion about this patch, it's possible to change
the status in dlm hb down event,
but what need to change are the dlm_reco_node_data structures in
dlm->reco.node_data list.
This list is initialized in dlm_remaster_locks when it begins the lock
remaster and destroied before exit this function.
So it's not proper to check data in such a list from dlm hb down event,
am I right?
If change the status from dlm hb down event , that means we make the
recovery thread rely on more information from the hb down event,
actually the dlm->live_nodes_map is marked in this event , and for
others to check , right?
This race condition only happen when cluster already in recovery and a
node dead during recovery. the recovery thread blocked the update of
dlm->domain_map, so I fallback to check the live_nodes_map, which won't
be blocked.
Please reconsider this patch.
Thanks,
Xiaowei
On 05/31/2012 09:18 AM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Xiaowei <xiaowei.hu@oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 06:09 AM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>> I would suggest exploring adding this in dlm hb down event. Checking live
>> map all
>> over the place is hacky. We do it more than we should right now. Let's not
>> add to the
>> mess.
>>
>> HI Sunil,
>>
>> Do you mean we should clear the bit in domain map in dlm hb down event
>> directly when the node down
>> and check with dlm_is_node_dead at here?
>> Or how could we explore and ensure the node is alive during the whole
>> migrate process?One node could die even after it sends out one locks package
>> and before the next if there were too many locks on that lockres.
> dlm hb down event is triggered when a node is declared dead. That's where we
> clean up pending mles, etc. You can add a check for recovery and add logic to
> change the reco state for that node there.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-25 5:53 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Fix waiting status race condition in dlm recovery xiaowei.hu at oracle.com
2012-05-25 22:17 ` srinivas eeda
2012-05-26 2:05 ` Xiaowei
2012-05-29 22:09 ` Sunil Mushran
2012-05-30 0:41 ` Xiaowei
2012-05-31 1:18 ` Sunil Mushran
2012-07-26 6:52 ` Xiaowei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5010E921.40808@oracle.com \
--to=xiaowei.hu@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox