From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: fix uninitialized variable access
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 10:42:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AC9D30.4000408@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150106160955.fd10d1aee8a0456fb6dc4846@linux-foundation.org>
On 01/07/2015 08:09 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 13:52:16 +0800 Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Variable "why" is not yet initialized at line 615, fix it.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
>> handle_t *handle = NULL;
>> struct ocfs2_alloc_context *data_ac = NULL;
>> struct ocfs2_alloc_context *meta_ac = NULL;
>> - enum ocfs2_alloc_restarted why;
>> + enum ocfs2_alloc_restarted why = RESTART_NONE;
>> struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
>> struct ocfs2_extent_tree et;
>> int did_quota = 0;
>
> Oh geeze, are you really sure about this? __ocfs2_extend_allocation()
> is as clear as mud. What happens when ocfs2_add_inode_data() returns
> -EAGAIN and leaves *reason_ret unwritten to?
*reason_ret will always be written when ocfs2_add_inode_data() return.
>
> What are the runtime effects of this bug?
I didn't see any other effects except a compile warning and an
uninitialized variable from the tracepoint.
Thanks,
Junxiao.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-25 5:52 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: fix uninitialized variable access Junxiao Bi
2014-12-25 5:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: fix wrong comment Junxiao Bi
2015-01-07 0:09 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: fix uninitialized variable access Andrew Morton
2015-01-07 2:42 ` Junxiao Bi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AC9D30.4000408@oracle.com \
--to=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).