From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/9 v6] ocfs2: support append O_DIRECT write
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:26:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BE1139.4090304@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BE0B46.8030301@huawei.com>
Hi Joseph,
Did this version make any performance improvement with v5? I tested v5,
and it didn't improve performance with original buffer write + sync.
Thanks,
Junxiao.
On 01/20/2015 04:01 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
> Currently in case of append O_DIRECT write (block not allocated yet),
> ocfs2 will fall back to buffered I/O. This has some disadvantages.
> Firstly, it is not the behavior as expected.
> Secondly, it will consume huge page cache, e.g. in mass backup scenario.
> Thirdly, modern filesystems such as ext4 support this feature.
>
> In this patch set, the direct I/O write doesn't fallback to buffer I/O
> write any more because the allocate blocks are enabled in direct I/O
> now.
>
> changelog:
> v6 <- v5:
> -- Take Mark's advice to use prefix "dio-" to distinguish dio orphan
> entry from unlink/rename.
> -- Take Mark's advice to treat this feature as a ro compat feature.
> -- Fix a bug in case of not cluster aligned io, cluster_align should
> be !zero_len, not !!zero_len.
> -- Fix a bug in case of fallocate with FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE.
> -- Fix the wrong *ppos and written when completing the rest request
> using buffer io.
>
> Corresponding ocfs2 tools (mkfs.ocfs2, tunefs.ocfs2, fsck.ocfs2, etc.)
> will be updated later.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 8:01 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/9 v6] ocfs2: support append O_DIRECT write Joseph Qi
2015-01-20 8:26 ` Junxiao Bi [this message]
2015-01-20 9:00 ` Joseph Qi
2015-01-22 2:10 ` Junxiao Bi
2015-01-22 3:54 ` Joseph Qi
2015-01-22 5:06 ` Junxiao Bi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-04 6:16 Ryan Ding
2015-08-04 9:03 ` Joseph Qi
2015-08-05 4:40 ` Ryan Ding
2015-08-05 6:40 ` Joseph Qi
2015-08-05 8:07 ` Ryan Ding
2015-08-05 11:18 ` Joseph Qi
2015-08-06 2:35 ` Ryan Ding
2015-08-05 7:08 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BE1139.4090304@oracle.com \
--to=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox