Linux ocfs2 filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/9 v6] ocfs2: support append O_DIRECT write
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:26:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BE1139.4090304@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BE0B46.8030301@huawei.com>

Hi Joseph,

Did this version make any performance improvement with v5? I tested v5,
and it didn't improve performance with original buffer write + sync.

Thanks,
Junxiao.

On 01/20/2015 04:01 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
> Currently in case of append O_DIRECT write (block not allocated yet),
> ocfs2 will fall back to buffered I/O. This has some disadvantages.
> Firstly, it is not the behavior as expected.
> Secondly, it will consume huge page cache, e.g. in mass backup scenario.
> Thirdly, modern filesystems such as ext4 support this feature.
> 
> In this patch set, the direct I/O write doesn't fallback to buffer I/O
> write any more because the allocate blocks are enabled in direct I/O
> now.
> 
> changelog:
> v6 <- v5:
> -- Take Mark's advice to use prefix "dio-" to distinguish dio orphan
>    entry from unlink/rename.
> -- Take Mark's advice to treat this feature as a ro compat feature.
> -- Fix a bug in case of not cluster aligned io, cluster_align should
>    be !zero_len, not !!zero_len.
> -- Fix a bug in case of fallocate with FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE.
> -- Fix the wrong *ppos and written when completing the rest request
>    using buffer io.
> 
> Corresponding ocfs2 tools (mkfs.ocfs2, tunefs.ocfs2, fsck.ocfs2, etc.)
> will be updated later.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-20  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-20  8:01 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/9 v6] ocfs2: support append O_DIRECT write Joseph Qi
2015-01-20  8:26 ` Junxiao Bi [this message]
2015-01-20  9:00   ` Joseph Qi
2015-01-22  2:10     ` Junxiao Bi
2015-01-22  3:54       ` Joseph Qi
2015-01-22  5:06         ` Junxiao Bi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-04  6:16 Ryan Ding
2015-08-04  9:03 ` Joseph Qi
2015-08-05  4:40   ` Ryan Ding
2015-08-05  6:40     ` Joseph Qi
2015-08-05  8:07       ` Ryan Ding
2015-08-05 11:18         ` Joseph Qi
2015-08-06  2:35           ` Ryan Ding
2015-08-05  7:08     ` Joseph Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54BE1139.4090304@oracle.com \
    --to=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox