From: WeiWei Wang <wangww631@huawei.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix wrong check in ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:41:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55668E69.8050004@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55601A42.8080803@huawei.com>
On 2015/5/23 14:12, Joseph Qi wrote:
> contig_blocks gotten from ocfs2_extent_map_get_blocks cannot be compared
> with clusters_to_alloc. So convert it to clusters first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
> Cc: Weiwei Wang <wangww631@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Wang <wangww631@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 8 +++++---
> fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> index d3eccc0..d922365 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
> unsigned char blocksize_bits = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
> unsigned long max_blocks = bh_result->b_size >> inode->i_blkbits;
> unsigned long len = bh_result->b_size;
> - unsigned int clusters_to_alloc = 0;
> + unsigned int clusters_to_alloc = 0, contig_clusters = 0;
>
> cpos = ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(inode->i_sb, iblock);
>
> @@ -560,8 +560,10 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
> /* fill hole, allocate blocks can't be larger than the size
> * of the hole */
> clusters_to_alloc = ocfs2_clusters_for_bytes(inode->i_sb, len);
> - if (clusters_to_alloc > contig_blocks)
> - clusters_to_alloc = contig_blocks;
> + contig_clusters = ocfs2_clusters_for_blocks(inode->i_sb,
> + contig_blocks);
> + if (clusters_to_alloc > contig_clusters)
> + clusters_to_alloc = contig_clusters;
>
> /* allocate extent and insert them into the extent tree */
> ret = ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, cpos,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> index 460c6c3..690ddc6 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> @@ -717,6 +717,16 @@ static inline u64 ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
> return (u64)clusters << c_to_b_bits;
> }
>
> +static inline u32 ocfs2_clusters_for_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
> + u64 blocks)
> +{
> + int b_to_c_bits = OCFS2_SB(sb)->s_clustersize_bits -
> + sb->s_blocksize_bits;
> +
> + blocks += (1 << b_to_c_bits) - 1;
> + return (u32)(blocks >> b_to_c_bits);
> +}
> +
> static inline u32 ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(struct super_block *sb,
> u64 blocks)
> {
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-23 6:12 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix wrong check in ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks Joseph Qi
2015-05-28 3:41 ` WeiWei Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55668E69.8050004@huawei.com \
--to=wangww631@huawei.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox