From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Do not lock/unlock() inode DLM lock
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:47:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568337C1.2000209@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451413209-26406-1-git-send-email-rgoldwyn@suse.de>
On 12/30/2015 02:20 AM, rgoldwyn at suse.de wrote:
> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>
> DLM does not cache locks. So, blocking lock and unlock
> will only make the performance worse where contention over
> the locks is high.
>
> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> index 20276e3..f92612e 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -2432,12 +2432,6 @@ bail:
> * done this we have to return AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE so the aop method
> * that called us can bubble that back up into the VFS who will then
> * immediately retry the aop call.
> - *
> - * We do a blocking lock and immediate unlock before returning, though, so that
> - * the lock has a great chance of being cached on this node by the time the VFS
> - * calls back to retry the aop. This has a potential to livelock as nodes
> - * ping locks back and forth, but that's a risk we're willing to take to avoid
> - * the lock inversion simply.
> */
> int ocfs2_inode_lock_with_page(struct inode *inode,
> struct buffer_head **ret_bh,
> @@ -2449,8 +2443,6 @@ int ocfs2_inode_lock_with_page(struct inode *inode,
> ret = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, ret_bh, ex, OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK);
> if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
> unlock_page(page);
> - if (ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, ret_bh, ex) == 0)
> - ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, ex);
> ret = AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-30 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-29 18:20 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Do not lock/unlock() inode DLM lock rgoldwyn at suse.de
2015-12-30 1:47 ` Junxiao Bi [this message]
2015-12-30 2:31 ` Gang He
2016-01-07 5:03 ` Eric Ren
2016-01-08 1:24 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2016-01-08 2:16 ` Zhen Ren
[not found] ` <5683B274020000F900023B30@suse.com>
2015-12-30 18:35 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2016-01-05 6:52 ` Gang He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568337C1.2000209@oracle.com \
--to=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox