ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: A race between refmap setting and clearing
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:24:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569609BE.8050802@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5695F616.9040105@oracle.com>

Hi Junxiao,

On 2016/1/13 15:00, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 02:21 PM, xuejiufei wrote:
>> Hi Junxiao,
>> I have not describe the issue clearly.
>>
>> Node 1                               Node 2(master)
>> dlmlock
>> dlm_do_master_request
>>                                 dlm_master_request_handler
>>                                 -> dlm_lockres_set_refmap_bit
>> dlmlock succeed
>> dlmunlock succeed
>>
>> dlm_purge_lockres
>>                                 dlm_deref_handler
>>                                 -> find lock resource is in
>>                                    DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG state,
>>                                    so dispatch a deref work
>> dlm_purge_lockres succeed.
>>
>> call dlmlock again
>> dlm_do_master_request
>>                                 dlm_master_request_handler
>>                                 -> dlm_lockres_set_refmap_bit
>>
>>                                 deref work trigger, call
>>                                 dlm_lockres_clear_refmap_bit
>>                                 to clear Node 1 from refmap
>>
>>                                 dlm_purge_lockres succeed
>>
>> dlm_send_remote_lock_request
>>                                 return DLM_IVLOCKID because
>>                                 the lockres is not exist
> More clear now. Thank you.
> This is a very complicated race. I didn't have a good solution to fix it
> now. Your fix looks work, but I am afraid if we keep going fix this
> kinds of races case by case, we will make dlm harder to understand and
> easy to involve bugs, maybe we should think about refactor dlm.
> 
Agree. IMO, the root cause is bit op cannot handle such a case.
I wonder if we have to change it to refcount, which may require a much
bigger refactoring.

Thanks,
Joseph

> Thanks,
> Junxiao.
> 
>> BUG if the lockres is $RECOVERY
>>
>> On 2016/1/13 10:46, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>> On 01/12/2016 03:16 PM, xuejiufei wrote:
>>>> Hi, Junxiao
>>>>
>>>> On 2016/1/12 12:03, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jiufei,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/11/2016 10:46 AM, xuejiufei wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> We have found a race between refmap setting and clearing which
>>>>>> will cause the lock resource on master is freed before other nodes
>>>>>> purge it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Node 1                               Node 2(master)
>>>>>> dlm_do_master_request
>>>>>>                                 dlm_master_request_handler
>>>>>>                                 -> dlm_lockres_set_refmap_bit
>>>>>> call dlm_purge_lockres after unlock
>>>>>>                                 dlm_deref_handler
>>>>>>                                 -> find lock resource is in
>>>>>>                                    DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG state,
>>>>>>                                    so dispatch a deref work
>>>>>> dlm_purge_lockres succeed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dlm_do_master_request
>>>>>>                                 dlm_master_request_handler
>>>>>>                                 -> dlm_lockres_set_refmap_bit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                                 deref work trigger, call
>>>>>>                                 dlm_lockres_clear_refmap_bit
>>>>>>                                 to clear Node 1 from refmap
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now Node 2 can purge the lock resource but the owner of lock resource
>>>>>> on Node 1 is still Node 2 which may trigger BUG if the lock resource
>>>>>> is $RECOVERY or other problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have discussed 2 solutions:
>>>>>> 1)The master return error to Node 1 if the DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG
>>>>>> is set. Node 1 will not retry and master send another message to Node 1
>>>>>> after clearing the refmap. Node 1 can purge the lock resource after the
>>>>>> refmap on master is cleared.
>>>>>> 2) The master return error to Node 1 if the DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG
>>>>>> is set, and Node 1 will retry to deref the lockres.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anybody has better ideas?
>>>>>>
>>>>> dlm_purge_lockres() will wait to drop ref until
>>>>> DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG cleared. So if set this flag when find the
>>>>> master during doing master request. And then this flag was cleared when
>>>>> receiving assert master message, can this fix the issue?
>>>>>
>>>> I don't think this can fix. Before doing master request, the lock resource is
>>>> already purged. The master should clear the refmap before client purge it.
>>> inflight_locks is increased in dlm_get_lock_resource() which will stop
>>> lockres purged? Set DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG when found lockres owner
>>> during master request, then this will stop lockres purged after unlock?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Junxiao.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jiufei
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Junxiao.
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> --Jiufei
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-13  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-11  2:46 [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: A race between refmap setting and clearing xuejiufei
2016-01-12  4:03 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-12  7:16   ` xuejiufei
2016-01-13  2:46     ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-13  6:21       ` xuejiufei
2016-01-13  7:00         ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-13  8:24           ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2016-01-18  4:28             ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-18  7:07               ` xuejiufei
2016-01-19  3:03                 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-19  8:19                   ` xuejiufei
2016-01-19  9:02                     ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-21  7:34 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-26  1:43   ` xuejiufei
2016-01-26  2:45     ` Junxiao Bi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569609BE.8050802@huawei.com \
    --to=joseph.qi@huawei.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).