From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: o2hb: not fence self if storage down
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:25:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A1AF34.4030006@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A038D8.1020207@oracle.com>
Hi Junxiao,
On 2016/1/21 9:48, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 08:46 AM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>> Hi Junxiao,
>> So you mean the negotiation you added only happens if all nodes storage
>> link down?
> Negotiation happened when one node found its storage link down, but
> success when all nodes storage link down, or it will keep the same
> behavior like before.
IC, thanks for your explanation.
IMHO, if storage down, all business deployed on the storage will be
impacted even nodes won't fence.
I have another scenario, only several paths (multipath environment) in
several nodes have problems, as a result, ocfs2 will fence these nodes.
So I wonder if we have a better way to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Joseph
>
> Thanks,
> Junxiao.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joseph
>>
>> On 2016/1/20 21:27, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>> Hi Joseph,
>>>
>>>> ? 2016?1?20????5:18?Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> ???
>>>>
>>>> Hi Junxiao,
>>>> Thanks for the patch set.
>>>> In case only one node storage link down, if this node doesn't fence
>>>> self, other nodes will still check and mark this node dead, which will
>>>> cause cluster membership inconsistency.
>>>> In your patch set, I cannot see any logic to handle this. Am I missing
>>>> something?
>>> No, there is no logic for this. But why didn?t node fence self when storage down? What make a softirq timer can?t be run, another bug?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Junxiao.
>>>>
>>>> On 2016/1/20 11:13, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> This serial of patches is to fix the issue that when storage down,
>>>>> all nodes will fence self due to write timeout.
>>>>> With this patch set, all nodes will keep going until storage back
>>>>> online, except if the following issue happens, then all nodes will
>>>>> do as before to fence self.
>>>>> 1. io error got
>>>>> 2. network between nodes down
>>>>> 3. nodes panic
>>>>>
>>>>> Junxiao Bi (6):
>>>>> ocfs2: o2hb: add negotiate timer
>>>>> ocfs2: o2hb: add NEGO_TIMEOUT message
>>>>> ocfs2: o2hb: add NEGOTIATE_APPROVE message
>>>>> ocfs2: o2hb: add some user/debug log
>>>>> ocfs2: o2hb: don't negotiate if last hb fail
>>>>> ocfs2: o2hb: fix hb hung time
>>>>>
>>>>> fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Junxiao.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
>>>>> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
>>>>> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-22 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-20 3:13 [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: o2hb: not fence self if storage down Junxiao Bi
2016-01-20 3:13 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ocfs2: o2hb: add negotiate timer Junxiao Bi
2016-01-21 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2016-01-22 3:23 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-22 0:56 ` Joseph Qi
2016-01-22 3:19 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-20 3:13 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/6] ocfs2: o2hb: add NEGO_TIMEOUT message Junxiao Bi
2016-01-21 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2016-01-22 5:12 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-22 5:45 ` Andrew Morton
2016-01-22 5:46 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-25 3:18 ` Eric Ren
2016-01-25 4:28 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-25 5:59 ` Eric Ren
2016-01-20 3:13 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 3/6] ocfs2: o2hb: add NEGOTIATE_APPROVE message Junxiao Bi
2016-01-20 3:13 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 4/6] ocfs2: o2hb: add some user/debug log Junxiao Bi
2016-01-25 3:28 ` Eric Ren
2016-01-25 4:29 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-25 6:00 ` Eric Ren
2016-01-20 3:13 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 5/6] ocfs2: o2hb: don't negotiate if last hb fail Junxiao Bi
2016-01-20 3:13 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 6/6] ocfs2: o2hb: fix hb hung time Junxiao Bi
2016-01-20 6:00 ` [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: o2hb: not fence self if storage down Gang He
2016-01-20 8:09 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-20 9:18 ` Joseph Qi
2016-01-20 13:27 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-21 0:46 ` Joseph Qi
2016-01-21 1:48 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-22 4:25 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2016-01-22 5:08 ` Junxiao Bi
2016-01-21 8:34 ` rwxybh
2016-01-21 8:41 ` Junxiao Bi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-02 7:56 Junxiao Bi
2016-05-23 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2016-05-23 23:40 ` Mark Fasheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A1AF34.4030006@huawei.com \
--to=joseph.qi@huawei.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).