From: piaojun <piaojun@huawei.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3] ocfs2: clean up redundant function declarations
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:39:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5AE11FC7.5000903@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09cf7125-6f12-e53e-20f5-e606b2c16b48@huawei.com>
LGTM
On 2018/4/25 19:21, Jia Guo wrote:
> The function ocfs2_extend_allocation has been deleted, clean up its
> declaration. Also change the static function name from
> __ocfs2_extend_allocation() to ocfs2_extend_allocation() to be
> consistent with the corresponding trace events as well as comments
> for ocfs2_lock_allocators().
>
> Fixes: 964f14a0d350 ("ocfs2: clean up some dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Guo <guojia12@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 10 +++++-----
> fs/ocfs2/file.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> index 6ee94bc..a2a8603 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
> @@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ int ocfs2_add_inode_data(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int __ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
> - u32 clusters_to_add, int mark_unwritten)
> +static int ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
> + u32 clusters_to_add, int mark_unwritten)
> {
> int status = 0;
> int restart_func = 0;
> @@ -1035,8 +1035,8 @@ int ocfs2_extend_no_holes(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh,
> clusters_to_add -= oi->ip_clusters;
>
> if (clusters_to_add) {
> - ret = __ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, oi->ip_clusters,
> - clusters_to_add, 0);
> + ret = ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, oi->ip_clusters,
> + clusters_to_add, 0);
> if (ret) {
> mlog_errno(ret);
> goto out;
> @@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static int ocfs2_allocate_unwritten_extents(struct inode *inode,
> goto next;
> }
>
> - ret = __ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, cpos, alloc_size, 1);
> + ret = ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, cpos, alloc_size, 1);
> if (ret) {
> if (ret != -ENOSPC)
> mlog_errno(ret);
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.h b/fs/ocfs2/file.h
> index 1fdc983..7eb7f03 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.h
> @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ int ocfs2_extend_no_holes(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh,
> u64 new_i_size, u64 zero_to);
> int ocfs2_zero_extend(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh,
> loff_t zero_to);
> -int ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
> - u32 clusters_to_add, int mark_unwritten);
> int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr);
> int ocfs2_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
> u32 request_mask, unsigned int flags);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 11:21 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3] ocfs2: clean up redundant function declarations Jia Guo
2018-04-26 0:39 ` piaojun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5AE11FC7.5000903@huawei.com \
--to=piaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).