public inbox for oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev
Cc: lkp@intel.com
Subject: [rppt:mm-selftest/v0.3 25/73] pkey-arm64.h:39:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'default_huge_page_size'
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 20:02:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202604011934.npNfj662-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

:::::: 
:::::: Manual check reason: "low confidence bisect report"
:::::: 

BCC: lkp@intel.com
CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
CC: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
TO: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git mm-selftest/v0.3
head:   474ceb1620939c629b4937e273e6f3f0386a648d
commit: 007f80623c7833379e679eead818aaa4650839ba [25/73] selftests/mm: move HugeTLB helpers to hugepage_settings
:::::: branch date: 5 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 8 hours ago
config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260401/202604011934.npNfj662-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260401/202604011934.npNfj662-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202604011934.npNfj662-lkp@intel.com/

Note: the rppt/mm-selftest/v0.3 HEAD 474ceb1620939c629b4937e273e6f3f0386a648d builds fine.
      It only hurts bisectability.

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from protection_keys.c:49:
   protection_keys.c: In function 'malloc_pkey_anon_huge':
>> pkey-arm64.h:39:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'default_huge_page_size' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      39 | #define HPAGE_SIZE              default_huge_page_size()
         |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   pkey-helpers.h:175:43: note: in definition of macro 'ALIGN_UP'
     175 | #define ALIGN_UP(x, align_to)   (((x) + ((align_to)-1)) & ~((align_to)-1))
         |                                           ^~~~~~~~
   protection_keys.c:691:31: note: in expansion of macro 'HPAGE_SIZE'
     691 |         size = ALIGN_UP(size, HPAGE_SIZE * 2);
         |                               ^~~~~~~~~~

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202604011934.npNfj662-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox