From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev
Cc: lkp@intel.com
Subject: include/arm64/processor.h:194:9: warning: "dma_wmb" redefined
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 06:00:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202607170503.MCC6Fa20-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
::::::
:::::: Manual check reason: "low confidence bisect report"
::::::
BCC: lkp@intel.com
CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
TO: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
CC: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com>
CC: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
tree: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jason-Gunthorpe/net-mlx5-Add-IFC-structures-for-CQE-and-WQE/20260717-052940
head: 7fabb466403102b484426d268d4c8f880947b202
commit: e94763f311902b31b644d9934178452e76132cce selftests: Add additional kernel functions to tools/include/
date: 6 hours ago
:::::: branch date: 6 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 6 hours ago
config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260717/202607170503.MCC6Fa20-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260717/202607170503.MCC6Fa20-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202607170503.MCC6Fa20-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from dirty_log_test.c:22:
>> include/arm64/processor.h:194:9: warning: "dma_wmb" redefined
194 | #define dma_wmb() dmb(oshst)
| ^~~~~~~
In file included from tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/asm/barrier.h:8,
from dirty_log_test.c:17:
tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/asm/../../arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:29:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
29 | #define dma_wmb() asm volatile("dmb oshst" ::: "memory")
| ^~~~~~~
>> include/arm64/processor.h:197:9: warning: "dma_rmb" redefined
197 | #define dma_rmb() dmb(oshld)
| ^~~~~~~
tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/asm/../../arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:28:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
28 | #define dma_rmb() asm volatile("dmb oshld" ::: "memory")
| ^~~~~~~
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
--
In file included from tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/asm/barrier.h:8,
from include/arm64/gic_v5.h:6,
from arm64/no-vgic.c:12:
>> tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/asm/../../arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:28:9: warning: "dma_rmb" redefined
28 | #define dma_rmb() asm volatile("dmb oshld" ::: "memory")
| ^~~~~~~
In file included from arm64/no-vgic.c:10:
include/arm64/processor.h:197:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
197 | #define dma_rmb() dmb(oshld)
| ^~~~~~~
>> tools/testing/selftests/../../../tools/include/asm/../../arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:29:9: warning: "dma_wmb" redefined
29 | #define dma_wmb() asm volatile("dmb oshst" ::: "memory")
| ^~~~~~~
include/arm64/processor.h:194:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
194 | #define dma_wmb() dmb(oshst)
| ^~~~~~~
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202607170503.MCC6Fa20-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox