* Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
[not found] <0d8fe02f58ccbc0c53714ea45b0a4303f2ee8206.1772162871.git.wqu@suse.com>
@ 2026-03-10 6:43 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-10 7:03 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-03-10 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo; +Cc: oe-lkp, lkp, linux-btrfs, oliver.sang
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.btrfs.052.fail" on:
commit: 50bb0fb60d1d55c7447535d17081ea009700cfd7 ("[PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qu-Wenruo/btrfs-drop-2K-block-size-support/20260227-113649
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0d8fe02f58ccbc0c53714ea45b0a4303f2ee8206.1772162871.git.wqu@suse.com/
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
in testcase: xfstests
version: xfstests-x86_64-63a29724-1_20260218
with following parameters:
disk: 6HDD
fs: btrfs
test: btrfs-052
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-func
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 8 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (Haswell) with 8G memory
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202603101405.288f83f3-lkp@intel.com
2026-03-06 18:12:00 cd /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests
2026-03-06 18:12:00 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sdb1
2026-03-06 18:12:00 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sdb1
2026-03-06 18:12:00 export FSTYP=btrfs
2026-03-06 18:12:00 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
2026-03-06 18:12:00 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
2026-03-06 18:12:00 export SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdb6"
2026-03-06 18:12:00 echo btrfs/052
2026-03-06 18:12:00 ./check btrfs/052
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-hsw-d01 7.0.0-rc1-00110-g50bb0fb60d1d #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Mar 7 01:56:32 CST 2026
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 /fs/scratch
btrfs/052 [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad)
--- tests/btrfs/052.out 2026-02-18 09:47:02.000000000 +0000
+++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad 2026-03-06 18:12:03.421371379 +0000
@@ -91,553 +91,5 @@
23 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
*
30
-0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
-*
-2 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
-*
...
(Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/btrfs/052.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: btrfs/052
Failures: btrfs/052
Failed 1 of 1 tests
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260310/202603101405.288f83f3-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
2026-03-10 6:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features kernel test robot
@ 2026-03-10 7:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-10 7:21 ` Oliver Sang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2026-03-10 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot, Qu Wenruo; +Cc: oe-lkp, lkp, linux-btrfs
在 2026/3/10 17:13, kernel test robot 写道:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.btrfs.052.fail" on:
>
> commit: 50bb0fb60d1d55c7447535d17081ea009700cfd7 ("[PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features")
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qu-Wenruo/btrfs-drop-2K-block-size-support/20260227-113649
> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0d8fe02f58ccbc0c53714ea45b0a4303f2ee8206.1772162871.git.wqu@suse.com/
> patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
>
> in testcase: xfstests
> version: xfstests-x86_64-63a29724-1_20260218
> with following parameters:
>
> disk: 6HDD
> fs: btrfs
> test: btrfs-052
>
>
>
> config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-func
> compiler: gcc-14
> test machine: 8 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (Haswell) with 8G memory
>
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>
>
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202603101405.288f83f3-lkp@intel.com
>
>
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 cd /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sdb1
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sdb1
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export FSTYP=btrfs
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdb6"
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 echo btrfs/052
> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 ./check btrfs/052
> FSTYP -- btrfs
> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-hsw-d01 7.0.0-rc1-00110-g50bb0fb60d1d #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Mar 7 01:56:32 CST 2026
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 /fs/scratch
>
> btrfs/052 [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad)
> --- tests/btrfs/052.out 2026-02-18 09:47:02.000000000 +0000
> +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad 2026-03-06 18:12:03.421371379 +0000
> @@ -91,553 +91,5 @@
> 23 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
> *
> 30
> -0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> -*
> -2 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
> -*
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/btrfs/052.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
> Ran: btrfs/052
> Failures: btrfs/052
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
Can you provide the full btrfs/052.full?
I checked my older logs (we have enabled larger folios for a while for
experimental tests) and can not fild a similar failure.
Thus I'm wondering what is causing the failure.
Thanks,
Qu
>
>
>
>
> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260310/202603101405.288f83f3-lkp@intel.com
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
2026-03-10 7:03 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2026-03-10 7:21 ` Oliver Sang
2026-03-10 7:58 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Sang @ 2026-03-10 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo; +Cc: Qu Wenruo, oe-lkp, lkp, linux-btrfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3460 bytes --]
hi, Qu,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 05:33:16PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> 在 2026/3/10 17:13, kernel test robot 写道:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.btrfs.052.fail" on:
> >
> > commit: 50bb0fb60d1d55c7447535d17081ea009700cfd7 ("[PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features")
> > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qu-Wenruo/btrfs-drop-2K-block-size-support/20260227-113649
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
> > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0d8fe02f58ccbc0c53714ea45b0a4303f2ee8206.1772162871.git.wqu@suse.com/
> > patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
> >
> > in testcase: xfstests
> > version: xfstests-x86_64-63a29724-1_20260218
> > with following parameters:
> >
> > disk: 6HDD
> > fs: btrfs
> > test: btrfs-052
> >
> >
> >
> > config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-func
> > compiler: gcc-14
> > test machine: 8 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (Haswell) with 8G memory
> >
> > (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
> >
> >
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202603101405.288f83f3-lkp@intel.com
> >
> >
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 cd /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sdb1
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sdb1
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export FSTYP=btrfs
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdb6"
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 echo btrfs/052
> > 2026-03-06 18:12:00 ./check btrfs/052
> > FSTYP -- btrfs
> > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-hsw-d01 7.0.0-rc1-00110-g50bb0fb60d1d #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Mar 7 01:56:32 CST 2026
> > MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2
> > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 /fs/scratch
> >
> > btrfs/052 [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad)
> > --- tests/btrfs/052.out 2026-02-18 09:47:02.000000000 +0000
> > +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad 2026-03-06 18:12:03.421371379 +0000
> > @@ -91,553 +91,5 @@
> > 23 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
> > *
> > 30
> > -0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> > -*
> > -2 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
> > -*
> > ...
> > (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/btrfs/052.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
> > Ran: btrfs/052
> > Failures: btrfs/052
> > Failed 1 of 1 tests
>
> Can you provide the full btrfs/052.full?
I attached tar.gz which contains all test results. thanks
>
> I checked my older logs (we have enabled larger folios for a while for
> experimental tests) and can not fild a similar failure.
>
> Thus I'm wondering what is causing the failure.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260310/202603101405.288f83f3-lkp@intel.com
> >
> >
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: results.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 703 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
2026-03-10 7:21 ` Oliver Sang
@ 2026-03-10 7:58 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-11 13:38 ` Oliver Sang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2026-03-10 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Sang, Qu Wenruo; +Cc: oe-lkp, lkp, linux-btrfs
在 2026/3/10 17:51, Oliver Sang 写道:
> hi, Qu,
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 05:33:16PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2026/3/10 17:13, kernel test robot 写道:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.btrfs.052.fail" on:
>>>
>>> commit: 50bb0fb60d1d55c7447535d17081ea009700cfd7 ("[PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features")
>>> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qu-Wenruo/btrfs-drop-2K-block-size-support/20260227-113649
>>> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
>>> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0d8fe02f58ccbc0c53714ea45b0a4303f2ee8206.1772162871.git.wqu@suse.com/
>>> patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
>>>
>>> in testcase: xfstests
>>> version: xfstests-x86_64-63a29724-1_20260218
>>> with following parameters:
>>>
>>> disk: 6HDD
>>> fs: btrfs
>>> test: btrfs-052
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-func
>>> compiler: gcc-14
>>> test machine: 8 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz (Haswell) with 8G memory
>>>
>>> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202603101405.288f83f3-lkp@intel.com
>>>
>>>
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 cd /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sdb1
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sdb1
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export FSTYP=btrfs
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 export SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdb6"
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 echo btrfs/052
>>> 2026-03-06 18:12:00 ./check btrfs/052
>>> FSTYP -- btrfs
>>> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-hsw-d01 7.0.0-rc1-00110-g50bb0fb60d1d #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Mar 7 01:56:32 CST 2026
>>> MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2
>>> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 /fs/scratch
>>>
>>> btrfs/052 [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad)
>>> --- tests/btrfs/052.out 2026-02-18 09:47:02.000000000 +0000
>>> +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad 2026-03-06 18:12:03.421371379 +0000
>>> @@ -91,553 +91,5 @@
>>> 23 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05
>>> *
>>> 30
>>> -0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> -*
>>> -2 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
>>> -*
>>> ...
>>> (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/btrfs/052.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/052.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
>>> Ran: btrfs/052
>>> Failures: btrfs/052
>>> Failed 1 of 1 tests
>>
>> Can you provide the full btrfs/052.full?
>
> I attached tar.gz which contains all test results. thanks
Thanks a lot!
It shows it's the defrag ioctl failed, and it's indeed a bug in that
patch, that I forgot to remove the experimental check from defrag.
Thus it won't cause bug for CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL but will cause
problems for end users.
Will get it fixed in the next update.
Thanks again for the consistent report!
Qu
>
>>
>> I checked my older logs (we have enabled larger folios for a while for
>> experimental tests) and can not fild a similar failure.
>>
>> Thus I'm wondering what is causing the failure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
>>> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260310/202603101405.288f83f3-lkp@intel.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features
2026-03-10 7:58 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2026-03-11 13:38 ` Oliver Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Sang @ 2026-03-11 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo; +Cc: Qu Wenruo, oe-lkp, lkp, linux-btrfs
hi, Qu,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 06:28:28PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[...]
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> It shows it's the defrag ioctl failed, and it's indeed a bug in that patch,
> that I forgot to remove the experimental check from defrag.
>
> Thus it won't cause bug for CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL but will cause
> problems for end users.
>
> Will get it fixed in the next update.
>
> Thanks again for the consistent report!
you are welcome :)
> Qu
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-11 13:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <0d8fe02f58ccbc0c53714ea45b0a4303f2ee8206.1772162871.git.wqu@suse.com>
2026-03-10 6:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] btrfs: move larger data folios out of experimental features kernel test robot
2026-03-10 7:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-10 7:21 ` Oliver Sang
2026-03-10 7:58 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-11 13:38 ` Oliver Sang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox