From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6745502682585100418=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] PPP Patches v3
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:49:15 -0700
Message-ID: <1269348555.11714.74.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <201003231434.39439.remi@remlab.net>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============6745502682585100418==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Remi,

> > If you have variables that are only valid inside the scope of a
> > statement, then I prefer if you only declare them there. This makes the
> > code a bit simpler to read. Check the patch I just pushed to give you an
> > example.
> =

> If you're serious about that, you should turn on C99 support. Only then y=
ou =

> can use C++-style for-loops.

I wasn't talking about the iterator variable.

Regards

Marcel



--===============6745502682585100418==--