Open Source Telephony
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gatchat: Emit notification when command is sent to modem.
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 11:07:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272964068.22838.226.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <i2ofb249edb1005031122hdc31004fo4a6b7738bbb1e2c8@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1371 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

> >> So I'm fine with the implementation but the name needs work.  Can we use
> >> g_at_chat_send_with_submit_notify? Or maybe g_at_chat_send_full, similar to
> >> how GLib does it.
> >>
> >> Perhaps enabling submit_notification for a given command after it has been
> >> submitted with g_at_chat_send?
> >>
> >> e.g. g_at_chat_set_submit_notify(GAtChat *chat, guint command,
> >> GAtSubmitNotifyFunc sent, gpointer user_data, GDestroyNotify notify);
> >
> > I am not a huge fan of the _full() stuff, but it is actually pretty nice
> > for the cases where 99% of users don't care. And this seems to be one of
> > them. The send_with_submit_notify() is way too long.
> >
> > Maybe g_at_chat_send_and_notify() is an acceptable simple version for
> > this or just g_at_chat_submit() and g_at_chat_send() to keep these
> > versions apart.
> 
> Here's a patch to add a g_at_chat_set_submit_notify function that
> modifies an already submitted command.  Removing the destroy callback
> from g_at_chat_send would require changing all the many uses of it.

the conclusion was to have g_at_chat_send_full with submit and destroy
notifier. And g_at_chat_send without the destroy notifier.

Yes, we might have to touch a lot of code, but that is fine. That is one
of the reasons why GAtChat is not a separate (yet).

Regards

Marcel



  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-04  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-29 11:32 [PATCH 3/4] gatchat: Emit notification when command is sent to modem Andrzej Zaborowski
2010-04-30  3:00 ` Denis Kenzior
2010-04-30  5:48   ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-04-30 13:31     ` Denis Kenzior
2010-04-30 13:41       ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-05-03 18:22     ` andrzej zaborowski
2010-05-04  9:07       ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2010-05-04 13:11         ` Andrzej Zaborowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1272964068.22838.226.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=ofono@ofono.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox