From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7252900263368581775==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] make bluetooth.{c,h} a static library Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:10:21 -0700 Message-ID: <1279494621.4572.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20100718230522.GB3406@vigoh> List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============7252900263368581775== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Gustavo, > > > Makefile.am | 7 +++---- > > > plugins/bluetooth.c | 3 --- > > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > = > > why are we doing this exactly? If I missed it, please explain it again > > since I am not sure that I agree. > = > We are doing this for the DUN daemon. As you guys said to me it will be > separated daemon in oFono sources, so we need bluetooth.c as a static > library to reuse it in the DUN daemon. we need to discuss this again. I am not sure it is the best idea to have this as a separate daemon. I argue with myself forth and back on this idea. One option is to do this as an oFono atom, another one is to do this as a separate daemon. Currently the atom idea is winning. Also there is no need to create a static library for doing this. That is just wrong. We can do the build magic with autofoo properly and without having to use a hack with a static library. Regards Marcel --===============7252900263368581775==--