From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0010574061785378119==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gprs: add function to handle activated context Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:53:06 -0800 Message-ID: <1294336386.2501.11.camel@aeonflux> In-Reply-To: List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============0010574061785378119== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sjur, > > I thought that we came to the conclusion that CID=3D0 is pretty much a > > really bad idea. So I would prefer that your modem is actually not using > > CID=3D0 ever. > Yea, I know you or Denis said so, but I'm not sure we understood your con= cern... I really thought it became pretty much clear during the discussion that introducing a CID=3D0 that is just special on LTE is a pretty much bad idea. As long as CID=3D0 concept does not exist in GSM/UMTS, you should not make LTE a special case. It will not fit and just makes things utterly complex for the telephony stack to figure out when contexts are moved from LTE to GSM/UMTS. If CID=3D0 is not valid for GSM/UTMS then you are in big trouble to make this work properly. And if it is valid, then there is no difference between it being CID=3D0 or any other CID. So please step away from the CID=3D0 idea and just give the next free CID to the network activated context. And per specification the CID start with 1. Regards Marcel --===============0010574061785378119==--