From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1263766403661008879==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [RFC 3/5] voicecall: Add ofono_voicecall_tty_notify api Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:03:34 -0800 Message-ID: <1294812214.3873.52.camel@aeonflux> In-Reply-To: <1294668092-27896-4-git-send-email-jeevaka.badrappan@elektrobit.com> List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============1263766403661008879== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jeevaka, > include/voicecall.h | 2 ++ > src/voicecall.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > = > diff --git a/include/voicecall.h b/include/voicecall.h > index e37d73b..6f1bdd2 100644 > --- a/include/voicecall.h > +++ b/include/voicecall.h > @@ -144,6 +144,8 @@ void ofono_voicecall_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *v= c, > void ofono_voicecall_disconnected(struct ofono_voicecall *vc, int id, > enum ofono_disconnect_reason reason, > const struct ofono_error *error); > +void ofono_voicecall_tty_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc, > + const struct ofono_call *call); what is the advantage of having this separate and not part of the regular voicecall_notify and just extending struct ofono_call with a field for TTY? Regards Marcel --===============1263766403661008879==--