From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] voicecallmanager-api: call related SS signals (proposal)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:07:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296133657.1520.145.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e514ceea10c7e8eb0f8d556e9764ea4e0c9abe04.1296122953.git.Andras.Domokos@nokia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1463 bytes --]
Hi Andras,
> Here is a proposal for expanding VoiceCallManager's DBus interface with
> call related Supplementary Services signals.
> The implementation would be based on the functionality provided by the SSN
> atom (handling the CSSU codes).
>
> ---
> doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt b/doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt
> index 2bf9ded..5212eac 100644
> --- a/doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt
> +++ b/doc/voicecallmanager-api.txt
> @@ -123,7 +123,59 @@ Methods dict GetProperties()
> '*', '#', 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D'. The last four are
> typically not used in normal circumstances.
>
> -Signals CallAdded(object path, dict properties)
> +Signals CallForwarded(object path)
> +
> + Signal sent during call setup when the incoming call is
> + a forwarded call. The signal contains the object path of
> + the call in cause.
I don't like this even a single bit. We changed the voice call API
exactly this way to avoid any potential race conditions between calls
and their properties. So please leave this as CallAdded() with the
object path and its properties.
Also having to watch more than three signals for call handling is a bit
overboard. This will cause a lot of extra traffic during setup towards
the D-Bus daemon. Pretty much a bad idea.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1296122953.git.Andras.Domokos@nokia.com>
2011-01-27 10:20 ` [RFC] voicecallmanager-api: call related SS signals (proposal) Andras Domokos
2011-01-27 10:39 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-01-27 13:07 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2011-01-27 15:54 ` Andras Domokos
2011-01-27 16:01 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-01-28 17:13 ` Andras Domokos
2011-01-28 18:19 ` Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296133657.1520.145.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox