From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6021943989179453590=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jukka Saunamaki <jukka.saunamaki@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] EF-SPN API to sim-atom
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:12:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1296630732.25947.19.camel@jsaunama-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <1296592705.2619.78.camel@tucson>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============6021943989179453590==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 22:38 +0200, ext Aki Niemi wrote:
> That reminds me, I think there are SIMs out there that use the CPHS ONS
> instead of SPN, and these can be used interchangeably.
> =

> Jukka, don't you actually also need the ONS?

In theory maybe, but in practice so far all cases where operator/service
provider name is needed for provisioning have had SPN.

--Jukka
 =



--===============6021943989179453590==--