Open Source Telephony
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: Selecting multiple radio access technologies in oFono
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:44:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296643483.1520.319.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=4tkd9Oe2+jhJdRjShX0VPYG=YsXysu=hSHiRo@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1798 bytes --]

Hi Sjur,

> >> > The current API has 'gsm', 'umts', 'lte' and 'any'. I think you are
> >> > suggesting something like 'all-but-lte', right?
> >> I think it would be nice if user could be able to select multiple
> >> preferred  bands, not just only one. The use case I came up with was
> >> this 'all-but-lte'.
> >
> > can we first be clear that we are talking about technology selection and
> > not band selection. They are different.
> >
> > Right now I have no idea on how the hardware will ever support this
> > properly.
> 
> FYI, as far as I know the STE will supports the following technology
> combinations:
> - GSM only (WCDMA/E-UTRAN off)
> - WCDMA only (GSM/E-UTRAN off)
> - GSM +WCDMA (E-UTRAN off)
> - E-UTRAN only (GSM/WCDMA off)
> - E-UTRAN+GSM (WCDMA off)
> - E-UTRAN+WCDMA (GSM off)
> 
> *If* we want to expose this kind of granularity on the oFono API,
> we should probably go with Remi's proposal with a boolean for each
> technology.

right now I prefer to keep it simple.

We also have to think about the CDMA+LTE combination and CDMA+GSM combo
chips. There is still a bit a uncertainty how these are going to look
like. And more important how we have to expose them.

> > RAT selection is already so different that I prefer to keep it
> > like this. It is simple. We can cross the LTE bridge once this becomes a
> > real problem.
> 
> If you want to keep it simple it's fine with me. But personally I
> agree with Paavo
> it could be useful to be able to set the radio in "all-but-lte" mode...

Couldn't this be achieved by actual band selection if you really really
wanted this? Do we actually have different LTE band at all. I am still
not all that familiar with the low-level radio technology behind LTE.

Regards

Marcel



  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-02 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31 13:59 Selecting multiple radio access technologies in oFono Paavo Leinonen
2011-01-31 14:08 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-02-01 20:25 ` Aki Niemi
2011-02-02  9:33   ` Paavo Leinonen
2011-02-02  9:42     ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-02-02 10:05       ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-02-02 10:31       ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-02-02 10:44         ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2011-02-02 12:00           ` Kjetil ASDAL
2011-02-02 12:46             ` Lucas De Marchi
2011-02-02 13:10               ` Kjetil ASDAL

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1296643483.1520.319.camel@aeonflux \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=ofono@ofono.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox