From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: Selecting multiple radio access technologies in oFono
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:44:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296643483.1520.319.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=4tkd9Oe2+jhJdRjShX0VPYG=YsXysu=hSHiRo@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1798 bytes --]
Hi Sjur,
> >> > The current API has 'gsm', 'umts', 'lte' and 'any'. I think you are
> >> > suggesting something like 'all-but-lte', right?
> >> I think it would be nice if user could be able to select multiple
> >> preferred bands, not just only one. The use case I came up with was
> >> this 'all-but-lte'.
> >
> > can we first be clear that we are talking about technology selection and
> > not band selection. They are different.
> >
> > Right now I have no idea on how the hardware will ever support this
> > properly.
>
> FYI, as far as I know the STE will supports the following technology
> combinations:
> - GSM only (WCDMA/E-UTRAN off)
> - WCDMA only (GSM/E-UTRAN off)
> - GSM +WCDMA (E-UTRAN off)
> - E-UTRAN only (GSM/WCDMA off)
> - E-UTRAN+GSM (WCDMA off)
> - E-UTRAN+WCDMA (GSM off)
>
> *If* we want to expose this kind of granularity on the oFono API,
> we should probably go with Remi's proposal with a boolean for each
> technology.
right now I prefer to keep it simple.
We also have to think about the CDMA+LTE combination and CDMA+GSM combo
chips. There is still a bit a uncertainty how these are going to look
like. And more important how we have to expose them.
> > RAT selection is already so different that I prefer to keep it
> > like this. It is simple. We can cross the LTE bridge once this becomes a
> > real problem.
>
> If you want to keep it simple it's fine with me. But personally I
> agree with Paavo
> it could be useful to be able to set the radio in "all-but-lte" mode...
Couldn't this be achieved by actual band selection if you really really
wanted this? Do we actually have different LTE band at all. I am still
not all that familiar with the low-level radio technology behind LTE.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 13:59 Selecting multiple radio access technologies in oFono Paavo Leinonen
2011-01-31 14:08 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-02-01 20:25 ` Aki Niemi
2011-02-02 9:33 ` Paavo Leinonen
2011-02-02 9:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-02-02 10:05 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-02-02 10:31 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-02-02 10:44 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2011-02-02 12:00 ` Kjetil ASDAL
2011-02-02 12:46 ` Lucas De Marchi
2011-02-02 13:10 ` Kjetil ASDAL
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296643483.1520.319.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox