From: Clement Viel <vielclement@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sim800: add sim800 support.
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:11:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113171122.GA5403@turing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b43cbce4-36b6-ecf0-0647-27efe2496c2c@norrbonn.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5966 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 05:53:56PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13/11/2018 16:33, Clement Viel wrote:
> >---
> > plugins/sim900.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/plugins/sim900.c b/plugins/sim900.c
> >index a7728cd..f280e5e 100644
> >--- a/plugins/sim900.c
> >+++ b/plugins/sim900.c
> >@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > #endif
> > #include <errno.h>
> >+#include <string.h>
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > #include <glib.h>
> > #include <gatchat.h>
> >@@ -60,13 +61,77 @@ static char *dlc_prefixes[NUM_DLC] = { "Voice: ", "Net: ", "SMS: ",
> > static const char *none_prefix[] = { NULL };
> >+enum type {
> >+ SIM800,
> >+ SIM900,
> >+ SIMCOM_UNKNOWN,
> >+};
> >+
>
> Makes more sense to have UNKNOWN be the first entry in the enumeration.
You're right !
>
> > struct sim900_data {
> > GIOChannel *device;
> > GAtMux *mux;
> > GAtChat * dlcs[NUM_DLC];
> > guint frame_size;
> >+ enum type modem_type;
> > };
> >+static void set_modem_type (const char *type, struct ofono_modem *modem)
> >+{
> >+ struct sim900_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
> >+
> >+ if (strcmp(type, "sim800") == 0)
> >+ data->modem_type = SIM800;
> >+ else if (strcmp(type, "sim900") == 0)
> >+ data->modem_type = SIM900;
> >+ else
> >+ data->modem_type = SIMCOM_UNKNOWN;
> >+ DBG("modem type is %d",data->modem_type);
> >+}
> >+
> >+static void mux_ready_notify(GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
> >+{
> >+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
> >+ struct sim900_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
> >+ struct ofono_gprs *gprs = NULL;
> >+ struct ofono_gprs_context *gc;
> >+
> >+ ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
> >+ data->dlcs[SMS_DLC]);
> >+
> >+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >+ if (gprs == NULL)
> >+ return;
> >+
> >+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM,
> >+ "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >+ if (gc)
> >+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
> >+
> >+
> >+}
> >+
> >+static void check_model(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
> >+{
> >+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
> >+ GAtResultIter iter;
> >+ char const *model;
> >+
> >+ DBG("");
> >+
> >+ g_at_result_iter_init(&iter, result);
> >+
> >+ while (g_at_result_iter_next(&iter, NULL)) {
> >+ if (!g_at_result_iter_next_unquoted_string(&iter, &model))
> >+ continue;
>
> The documentation doesn't indicate that the model type is given as an
> arbitrary string at a random location in the response. It's pretty specific
> about the SIM800/SIM900 token appearing as the first element of the
> response. Is the documentation not correct on this point?
>
> >+
> >+ DBG("setting type %s", model);
> >+ if (strstr(model, "SIM800"))
> >+ set_modem_type("sim800", modem);
>
> Instead of doing this dance with strings, just directly set the type:
>
> data->modem_type = SIM800;
>
>
Right again.
> >+ else if (strstr(model, "SIM900"))
> >+ set_modem_type("sim900", modem);
> >+ }
> >+}
> >+
> > static int sim900_probe(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > {
> > struct sim900_data *data;
> >@@ -78,7 +143,6 @@ static int sim900_probe(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > ofono_modem_set_data(modem, data);
> >-
>
> Whitespace.
>
> > return 0;
> > }
> >@@ -111,6 +175,7 @@ static GAtChat *open_device(struct ofono_modem *modem,
> > GHashTable *options;
> > device = ofono_modem_get_string(modem, key);
> >+
>
> Ditto.
>
> > if (device == NULL)
> > return NULL;
> >@@ -232,6 +297,11 @@ static void setup_internal_mux(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > goto error;
> > }
> > }
> >+ if (data->modem_type == SIM800) {
> >+ for (i = 0; i<NUM_DLC; i++) {
> >+ g_at_chat_register(data->dlcs[i], "SMS Ready", mux_ready_notify, FALSE, modem, NULL);
> >+ }
> >+ }
> > ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, TRUE);
> >@@ -294,6 +364,7 @@ static int sim900_enable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > g_at_chat_send(data->dlcs[SETUP_DLC], "ATE0", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >+ g_at_chat_send(data->dlcs[SETUP_DLC], "AT+CGMM", NULL,check_model, modem, NULL);
> > /* For obtain correct sms service number */
> > g_at_chat_send(data->dlcs[SETUP_DLC], "AT+CSCS=\"GSM\"", NULL,
> >@@ -353,18 +424,20 @@ static void sim900_post_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> > DBG("%p", modem);
> >- ofono_phonebook_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[VOICE_DLC]);
> >- ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
> >+ if (data->modem_type != SIM800) {
> >+ ofono_phonebook_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[VOICE_DLC]);
> >+ ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
> > data->dlcs[SMS_DLC]);
> >- gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >- if (gprs == NULL)
> >- return;
> >+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >+ if (gprs == NULL)
> >+ return;
> >- gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM_SIM900,
> >+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM_SIM900,
> > "atmodem", data->dlcs[GPRS_DLC]);
> >- if (gc)
> >- ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
> >+ if (gc)
> >+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
> >+ }
>
> All this is duplicated in mux_ready_notify... maybe move it a function of
> its own...?
this is duplicated because the ofono atoms cannot be created at the same point for the two modems :
for sim800, we must wait for an URC stating that channels have been created whereas sim900 is much straightforward.
That's why i've splitted : one in post_sim (sim900) another in mux_ready_notify (sim800).
>
> > }
> > static void sim900_post_online(struct ofono_modem *modem)
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-13 15:33 [PATCH 1/3] sim800: add sim800 support Clement Viel
2018-11-13 16:53 ` Jonas Bonn
2018-11-13 17:11 ` Clement Viel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-13 17:19 Clement Viel
2018-11-14 20:34 ` Denis Kenzior
2018-11-13 9:29 Clement Viel
2018-11-13 11:59 ` Giacinto Cifelli
2018-11-13 15:00 ` Clement Viel
2018-11-13 15:04 ` Marcel Holtmann
2018-11-13 15:11 ` Jonas Bonn
2018-11-13 15:28 ` Clement Viel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113171122.GA5403@turing \
--to=vielclement@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox