Hi!

> >I have problems with getting CNMA to work, so I'm exploring other
> >possibilities. Apparently ofono should be able to work without
> >that.. but is it working properly?
> >
> >ofonod[5218]: < \r\n+CIEV: 1,3\r\n
> >ofonod[5218]: < \r\n+CIEV: 1,4\r\n
> >ofonod[5218]: < \r\n+CMTI: "ME",2\r\n
> >ofonod[5218]: drivers/atmodem/sms.c:at_cmti_notify() Got a CMTI
> >indication at ME, index: 2
> >ofonod[5218]: > AT+CMGR=2\r
> >ofonod[5218]: < \r\nOK\r\n
> 
> That's quite strange, CMGR response should have an intermediate response
> prefixed by +CMGR: prior to the OK.  Your modem is just weird ;)

Yes, it is.

> >ofonod[5218]: > AT+CMGD=2\r
> >ofonod[5218]: < \r\nOK\r\n
> >ofonod[5218]: < \r\n+CIEV: 1,3\r\n
> >ofonod[5218]: < \r\n+CIEV: 1,4\r\n
> >
> >So.... modem told us we have new message and where it is, but then
> >ofono ... deleted the message without delivering it...?
> >
> 
> What the stock AT modem driver does is reads the message and deletes it
> right away.  Somehow your modem says 'sure' to the read request without
> actually reading the message.  Maybe the firmware is just too slow or oFono
> is too fast, or maybe this modem needs extra special magic.

Would it make sense not to proceed with +CMGD in case modem did not
provide a message for +CMGR?

I don't think it is timing, as we see OK after CMGR...

Fortunately, I found a mode that works...

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html