From: Sebastian Mancke <asteban@gmx.de>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: DBus APIs
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:50:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0BBF4D.10901@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905131151.01568.denkenz@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2338 bytes --]
Hi Denis,
thanks for the direct answer. I don't wanted to be unfair at all ;-)
I Will take a deeper look into the differences of both DBus APIs to get
a better understanding of your reasons.
Regards,
Sebastian
Denis Kenzior schrieb:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Wednesday 13 May 2009 10:17:50 Sebastian Mancke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just saw the new project and was wondering why there is a completely
>> new project for this purpose.
>>
>> For me, ofone looks very similar to the freesmartphone.org initiative.
>> Did you take a deep look into other existing projects? What are your
>> opinions not to join those efforts?
>
> We had a very deep look actually, and not only freesmartphone, but also
> Qtopia. These projects are very similar to oFono on the surface, but their
> APIs just do not fill our needs. E.g. to have a telephony stack that is GCF-
> certification ready and can be used by UI developers with minimal effort on
> their part.
>
> In the case of Qtopia it carries too much legacy baggage. In the case of FSO:
> any API that exposes such low-level details as SMS DCS will never be good
> enough. UI developers simply should never have to care.
>
>> In the case of freesmartphone.org I appreciate the goal of focusing on
>> the design of the DBus APIs, instead of 'just' an implementation. It
>> would be really cool to get alternative Implementations (e.g. written in
>> C) for those APIs. On the other hand it would be too bad not to regard
>> the experiences they made.
>
> You're assuming that oFono developers do not have previous telephony
> experience themselves. Not a fair assumption at all ;) We have our own ideas
> and as pointed out above, we did learn from the FSO project.
>
> Regards,
> -Denis
> _______________________________________________
> ofono mailing list
> ofono(a)ofono.org
> http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
>
--
tarent Gesellschaft für Softwareentwicklung und IT-Beratung mbH
Heilsbachstr. 24, 53123 Bonn | Poststr. 4-5, 10178 Berlin
fon: +49(228) / 52675-0 | fon: +49(30) / 27594853
fax: +49(228) / 52675-25 | fax: +49(30) / 78709617
durchwahl: +49(228) / 52675-17 | mobil: +49(171) / 7673249
Geschäftsführer:
Boris Esser, Elmar Geese
HRB AG Bonn 5168
Ust-ID: DE122264941
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-13 15:17 DBus APIs Sebastian Mancke
2009-05-13 16:51 ` Denis Kenzior
2009-05-14 6:50 ` Sebastian Mancke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0BBF4D.10901@gmx.de \
--to=asteban@gmx.de \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox