From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] simutil: response-handler returns now also file-status
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:41:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB6DE4D.1030107@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286896694-3054-4-git-send-email-petteri.tikander@ixonos.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2462 bytes --]
Hi Petteri,
On 10/12/2010 10:18 AM, Petteri Tikander wrote:
> ---
> src/simutil.c | 5 ++++-
> src/simutil.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/simutil.c b/src/simutil.c
> index 65ce1ac..04ba975 100644
> --- a/src/simutil.c
> +++ b/src/simutil.c
> @@ -1405,7 +1405,8 @@ gboolean sim_parse_3g_get_response(const unsigned char *data, int len,
>
> gboolean sim_parse_2g_get_response(const unsigned char *response, int len,
> int *file_len, int *record_len,
> - int *structure, unsigned char *access)
> + int *structure, unsigned char *access,
> + unsigned char *file_status)
> {
> if (len < 14 || response[6] != 0x04)
> return FALSE;
> @@ -1420,6 +1421,8 @@ gboolean sim_parse_2g_get_response(const unsigned char *response, int len,
> access[1] = response[9];
> access[2] = response[10];
>
> + *file_status = response[11];
> +
> if (response[13] == 0x01 || response[13] == 0x03)
> *record_len = response[14];
> else
This looks fine.
> diff --git a/src/simutil.h b/src/simutil.h
> index 54b99a0..bd8e4ac 100644
> --- a/src/simutil.h
> +++ b/src/simutil.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ enum sim_file_access {
> SIM_FILE_ACCESS_NEVER = 15,
> };
>
> +/* 51.011 Section 9.3 */
> +enum sim_file_status {
> + SIM_FILE_STATUS_INVALID = 0x00,
> + SIM_FILE_STATUS_NOT_INVALID = 0x01,
> + SIM_FILE_STATUS_INVALID_BUT_ACCESS = 0x04,
> + SIM_FILE_STATUS_NOT_AVAILABLE = 0xFF,
> +};
> +
I don't like this, you should structure this enum as a set of status flags.
E.g. SIM_FILE_STATUS_VALID = 0x01, SIM_FILE_STATUS_RW_WHEN_INVALID = 0x04
I don't see the need for the NOT_AVAILABLE enum since you will never
check this status in the 3G case. Passing 0 here is fine. But feel
free to correct me if I'm wrong.
> /* 131.102 Section 4.2.8 */
> enum sim_ust_service {
> SIM_UST_SERVICE_LOCAL_PHONE_BOOK = 0,
> @@ -425,7 +433,8 @@ gboolean sim_parse_3g_get_response(const unsigned char *data, int len,
>
> gboolean sim_parse_2g_get_response(const unsigned char *response, int len,
> int *file_len, int *record_len,
> - int *structure, unsigned char *access);
> + int *structure, unsigned char *access,
> + unsigned char *file_status);
>
> gboolean sim_ust_is_available(unsigned char *service_ust, unsigned char len,
> enum sim_ust_service index);
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-14 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 15:18 Handling of Fixed Dialing v3 Petteri Tikander
2010-10-12 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] sim: add function to read general info from SIM EF-file Petteri Tikander
2010-10-12 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] simfs: add logic to retrieve only only EF-info, but no EF-contents Petteri Tikander
2010-10-12 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] simutil: response-handler returns now also file-status Petteri Tikander
2010-10-12 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] atmodem: returns file-status of SIM EF-file Petteri Tikander
2010-10-12 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] isimodem: " Petteri Tikander
2010-10-12 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] simutil: add ID of EFadn Petteri Tikander
2010-10-12 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] sim: check if Fixed Dialing is enabled in the SIM-card Petteri Tikander
2010-10-12 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] doc: update sim-api Petteri Tikander
2010-10-14 5:56 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-10-14 11:22 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] sim: check if Fixed Dialing is enabled in the SIM-card Denis Kenzior
2010-10-14 11:24 ` Denis Kenzior
2010-10-14 10:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] simutil: add ID of EFadn Denis Kenzior
2010-10-14 10:58 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] isimodem: returns file-status of SIM EF-file Denis Kenzior
2010-10-14 10:57 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] atmodem: " Denis Kenzior
2010-10-14 16:54 ` Petteri Tikander
2010-10-14 11:03 ` Denis Kenzior
2010-10-14 10:41 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2010-10-14 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] simutil: response-handler returns now also file-status Petteri Tikander
2010-10-14 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] simfs: add logic to retrieve only only EF-info, but no EF-contents Denis Kenzior
2010-10-14 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] sim: add function to read general info from SIM EF-file Denis Kenzior
2010-10-14 15:14 ` Petteri Tikander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB6DE4D.1030107@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox