From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0346266132396462720=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jessica Nilsson <jessica.j.nilsson@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] isimodem: Adding version isimodem and isimodem2.5
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:20:01 +0100
Message-ID: <4D3ECE01.7070309@stericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik7d2_wahOGoEb3fSGbgfJw1vLfbyrbKeH7wofR@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============0346266132396462720==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On 01/25/2011 01:39 PM, Aki Niemi wrote:

> I don't think there is a need for this, as ISI itself already provides
> both ISI version (which we have available always via the
> g_isi_client_verify() call), and in many cases also the resource ID as
> means to find the correct quirk to use.
>
> Of course, I could be convinced otherwise, but not without seeing
> actual patches. It might become extremely ugly with using ISI version
> and the resource ID, and using something like vendor.h might then make
> sense.
>


Ok, understood. We will see what we can do.

Best Regards,
Jessica

--===============0346266132396462720==--