Open Source Telephony
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] voicecall: add SSN handling functions
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:03:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6FF3FD.2000601@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0199f9e3a809bb5fd3190897b1a252d49d946f2.1299168583.git.Andras.Domokos@nokia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7788 bytes --]

Hi Andras,

On 03/03/2011 10:48 AM, Andras Domokos wrote:
> ---
>  include/types.h     |    2 +
>  include/voicecall.h |    6 ++
>  src/voicecall.c     |  156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 

Please make sure to split this patch into several in accordance to our
patch submission guidelines.  See HACKING document, specifically the
'Submitting Patches' section.

> diff --git a/include/types.h b/include/types.h
> index d25f409..b639c8a 100644
> --- a/include/types.h
> +++ b/include/types.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ struct ofono_call {
>  	char name[OFONO_MAX_CALLER_NAME_LENGTH + 1];
>  	int clip_validity;
>  	int cnap_validity;
> +	ofono_bool_t remote_held;
> +	ofono_bool_t remote_multiparty;

I really don't like these being here.  Lets put them onto the struct
voicecall object in src/voicecall.c.  The logic for setting remote_held
and remote_multiparty is something that belongs in the core and should
not be exposed to the driver.

>  };
>  
>  struct ofono_network_time {
> diff --git a/include/voicecall.h b/include/voicecall.h
> index f00eb08..5e6da02 100644
> --- a/include/voicecall.h
> +++ b/include/voicecall.h
> @@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ void ofono_voicecall_set_data(struct ofono_voicecall *vc, void *data);
>  void *ofono_voicecall_get_data(struct ofono_voicecall *vc);
>  int ofono_voicecall_get_next_callid(struct ofono_voicecall *vc);
>  
> +void ofono_voicecall_ssn_mo_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc, unsigned int id,
> +					int code, int index);
> +void ofono_voicecall_ssn_mt_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc, unsigned int id,
> +					int code, int index,
> +					const struct ofono_phone_number *ph);
> +

Looks good, but as I mentioned this should be a separate patch.

>  #ifdef __cplusplus
>  }
>  #endif
> diff --git a/src/voicecall.c b/src/voicecall.c
> index ec001c0..e5936f5 100644
> --- a/src/voicecall.c
> +++ b/src/voicecall.c
> @@ -400,6 +400,12 @@ static void append_voicecall_properties(struct voicecall *v,
>  
>  	ofono_dbus_dict_append(dict, "Multiparty", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN, &mpty);
>  
> +	ofono_dbus_dict_append(dict, "RemoteHeld", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN,
> +				&call->remote_held);
> +
> +	ofono_dbus_dict_append(dict, "RemoteMultiparty", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN,
> +				&call->remote_multiparty);
> +
>  	if (v->message)
>  		ofono_dbus_dict_append(dict, "Information",
>  						DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &v->message);
> @@ -1869,6 +1875,8 @@ static GDBusMethodTable manager_methods[] = {
>  };
>  
>  static GDBusSignalTable manager_signals[] = {
> +	{ "Forwarded",	 	 "s" },
> +	{ "BarringActive",	 "s" },
>  	{ "PropertyChanged",	"sv" },
>  	{ "CallAdded",		"oa{sv}" },
>  	{ "CallRemoved",	"o" },
> @@ -2684,3 +2692,151 @@ void __ofono_voicecall_tone_cancel(struct ofono_voicecall *vc, int id)
>  		tone_request_run(vc);
>  	}
>  }
> +
> +static void ssn_mt_forwarded_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc,
> +					unsigned int id, int code,
> +					const struct ofono_phone_number *ph)
> +{
> +	DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> +	const char *path = __ofono_atom_get_path(vc->atom);
> +	char *info = "incoming";
> +
> +	g_dbus_emit_signal(conn, path, OFONO_VOICECALL_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
> +				"Forwarded",
> +				DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &info,
> +				DBUS_TYPE_INVALID);
> +}
> +
> +static struct voicecall *voicecall_select(struct ofono_voicecall *vc,
> +						unsigned int id, int code)
> +{
> +	struct voicecall *v = NULL;
> +	GSList *l;
> +
> +	for (l = vc->call_list; l; l = l->next) {
> +		struct voicecall *v1 = l->data;
> +
> +		if (id == 0 && g_slist_length(vc->call_list) == 1) {
> +			if (code == SS_MT_VOICECALL_RETRIEVED &&
> +					v1->call->remote_held == TRUE) {
> +				v = v1;
> +				break;
> +			} else if (code == SS_MT_VOICECALL_ON_HOLD &&
> +					v1->call->remote_held == FALSE) {
> +				v = v1;
> +				break;
> +			} else if (code == SS_MT_MULTIPARTY_VOICECALL &&
> +					v1->call->remote_multiparty == FALSE) {
> +				v = v1;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		} else if (v1->call->id == id) {
> +			v = v1;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return v;
> +}

I suspect this might be easier to understand if it was re-written to use
g_slist_find_custom instead of jumbling unrelated logic (with a similar
implementation) into a single function.

> +
> +static void ssn_mt_remote_held_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc,
> +					unsigned int id, int code,
> +					const struct ofono_phone_number *ph)
> +{
> +	struct voicecall *v = voicecall_select(vc, id, code);
> +	DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> +	const char *path;
> +
> +	if (v == NULL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (code == SS_MT_VOICECALL_ON_HOLD)
> +		v->call->remote_held = TRUE;
> +	else
> +		v->call->remote_held = FALSE;
> +
> +	path = voicecall_build_path(vc, v->call);
> +
> +	ofono_dbus_signal_property_changed(conn, path,
> +						OFONO_VOICECALL_INTERFACE,
> +						"RemoteHeld", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN,
> +						&v->call->remote_held);
> +}
> +
> +static void ssn_mt_remote_multiparty_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc,
> +					unsigned int id, int code,
> +					const struct ofono_phone_number *ph)
> +{
> +	struct voicecall *v = voicecall_select(vc, id, code);
> +	DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> +	const char *path;
> +
> +	if (v == NULL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	v->call->remote_multiparty = TRUE;
> +
> +	path = voicecall_build_path(vc, v->call);
> +
> +	ofono_dbus_signal_property_changed(conn, path,
> +					OFONO_VOICECALL_INTERFACE,
> +					"RemoteMultiparty", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN,
> +					&v->call->remote_multiparty);
> +}
> +
> +void ofono_voicecall_ssn_mt_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc,
> +					unsigned int id, int code, int index,
> +					const struct ofono_phone_number *ph)
> +{
> +
> +	if (code == SS_MT_CALL_FORWARDED)
> +		ssn_mt_forwarded_notify(vc, id, code, ph);
> +	else if (code == SS_MT_VOICECALL_ON_HOLD)
> +		ssn_mt_remote_held_notify(vc, id, code, ph);
> +	else if (code == SS_MT_VOICECALL_RETRIEVED)
> +		ssn_mt_remote_held_notify(vc, id, code, ph);
> +	else if (code == SS_MT_MULTIPARTY_VOICECALL)
> +		ssn_mt_remote_multiparty_notify(vc, id, code, ph);

Please use a switch/case here

> +}
> +
> +static void ssn_mo_call_barred_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc,
> +					unsigned int id, int code)
> +{
> +	DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> +	const char *path = __ofono_atom_get_path(vc->atom);
> +	const char *info;
> +
> +	if (code == SS_MO_INCOMING_BARRING)
> +		info = "remote";
> +	else
> +		info = "local";
> +
> +	g_dbus_emit_signal(conn, path, OFONO_VOICECALL_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
> +				"BarringActive",
> +				DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &info,
> +				DBUS_TYPE_INVALID);
> +}
> +
> +static void ssn_mo_forwarded_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc,
> +					unsigned int id, int code)
> +{
> +	DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> +	const char *path = __ofono_atom_get_path(vc->atom);
> +	char *info = "outgoing";
> +
> +	g_dbus_emit_signal(conn, path, OFONO_VOICECALL_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
> +				"Forwarded",
> +				DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &info,
> +				DBUS_TYPE_INVALID);
> +}
> +
> +void ofono_voicecall_ssn_mo_notify(struct ofono_voicecall *vc,
> +					unsigned int id, int code, int index)
> +{
> +	if (code == SS_MO_OUTGOING_BARRING)
> +		ssn_mo_call_barred_notify(vc, id, code);
> +	else if (code == SS_MO_INCOMING_BARRING)
> +		ssn_mo_call_barred_notify(vc, id, code);
> +	else if (code == SS_MO_CALL_FORWARDED)
> +		ssn_mo_forwarded_notify(vc, id, code);

Please use a switch/case here.  It is much easier to read and extend.

> +}

Regards,
-Denis

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-03 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-03 16:47 [PATCH 0/3] Voice call SS notifications (3rd version) Andras Domokos
2011-03-03 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] ssn: remove SSN atom completely Andras Domokos
2011-03-03 19:51   ` Denis Kenzior
2011-03-04 12:11     ` Andras Domokos
2011-03-03 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] voicecall: add SSN handling functions Andras Domokos
2011-03-03 20:03   ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2011-03-04 12:26     ` Andras Domokos
2011-03-03 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] atmodem: add SSN handling Andras Domokos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D6FF3FD.2000601@gmail.com \
    --to=denkenz@gmail.com \
    --cc=ofono@ofono.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox