From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/5] Mobile broadband provider info plugin
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:37:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4D5BCE.7040901@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4A7A9F.8050208@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1686 bytes --]
Hi Oleg,
On 08/16/2011 09:11 AM, Oleg Zhurakivskyy wrote:
> Hello Denis,
>
> On 08/12/2011 09:55 AM, Denis Kenzior wrote:
>>> +static struct ofono_gprs_provision_data *apn_try_new(struct
>>> parser_data *data)
>>> +{
>>> + void *p;
>>> +
>>> + p = g_try_realloc(*data->settings,
>>> + sizeof(struct ofono_gprs_provision_data) *
>>> + (data->count + 1));
>>> + if (p == NULL)
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + *data->settings = p;
>>> +
>>> + data->context = *data->settings + data->count++;
>>> +
>>> + memset(data->context, 0, sizeof(struct ofono_gprs_provision_data));
>>
>> This seems like a really big hammer. We have 3 settings we're likely to
>> provision, internet, wap, mms. The function runs synchronously and
>> oFono is not threaded. So in theory you can allocate the context
>> information statically and only copy it to the caller once you have
>> completed the parser.
>
> Hmm, statically allocated array of settings was in the previous version.
> Then the wish was to make it dynamic and to use realloc. Can we settle
> on an approach here?
>
The preference is to always allocate statically if you can get away with
it; if you do not need to use malloc/realloc, then please don't. I do
not believe the earlier feedback you received is in conflict here.
Using a static array for the parser and only allocating the return array
is the preferred approach since we should not be returning more than 1
internet, 1 wap and 1 mms setting. If you have multiple of any of these
then you should not provision as it indicates that user's input is required.
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-05 12:25 [PATCHv3 0/5] Mobile broadband provider info plugin Oleg Zhurakivskyy
2011-08-05 12:25 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] " Oleg Zhurakivskyy
2011-08-12 6:55 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-08-16 14:11 ` Oleg Zhurakivskyy
2011-08-18 18:37 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2011-08-05 12:25 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] GPRS context plan support Oleg Zhurakivskyy
2011-08-12 6:43 ` Denis Kenzior
2011-08-05 12:26 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] GPRS provisioning data " Oleg Zhurakivskyy
2011-08-05 12:26 ` [PATCHv3 4/5] Mobile broadband provider info plugin autoconf support Oleg Zhurakivskyy
2011-08-05 12:26 ` [PATCHv3 5/5] Mobile broadband provider info plugin makefile changes Oleg Zhurakivskyy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4D5BCE.7040901@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox