From: Philippe Nunes <philippe.nunes@linux.intel.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ussd: Recover idle state in case of response sending failure
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:15:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50374617.7050401@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50367059.9050406@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2181 bytes --]
On 08/23/2012 08:03 PM, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> On 08/23/2012 11:27 AM, Philippe Nunes wrote:
>> GCF test case 31.8.1.2.3 is rejecting the user response.
>> Any subsequent USSD notification are not handled because USSD is
>> always in
>> state user-action.
>> ---
>> src/ussd.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/ussd.c b/src/ussd.c
>> index 74888b2..21e0164 100644
>> --- a/src/ussd.c
>> +++ b/src/ussd.c
>> @@ -414,6 +414,18 @@ void ofono_ussd_notify(struct ofono_ussd *ussd,
>> int status, int dcs,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + if (status == OFONO_USSD_STATUS_TERMINATED&&
>> + (ussd->state == USSD_STATE_IDLE ||
>> + ussd->state == USSD_STATE_USER_ACTION)) {
>
> This check makes no sense, why bother checking for ussd->state ==
> USSD_STATE_IDLE?
The issue has been unveiled after a network initiated USSD request:
\r\n+CUSD: 1,"Type *70*635*562# and send",15\r\n
src/ussd.c:ofono_ussd_notify() status: 1 ACTION_REQUIRED, state: 0 IDLE
then we try to give an answer:
AT+CUSD=1,"*70*635*562#",15\r
\r\n+CUSD: 2\r\n
\r\n+CME ERROR: 100\r\n
I presume that the same error could occur after a user USSD request. In
this case, the state is still 'idle' and the "Terminated" notification
results in a "NotificationReceived" signal with a NULL string. To avoid
this, I need to check also for ussd->state == USSD_STATE_IDLE. That's
why the first version was for me more appropriate.
>
>> + ussd_change_state(ussd, USSD_STATE_IDLE);
>> +
>> + if (ussd->pending == NULL)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + reply = __ofono_error_not_supported(ussd->pending);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>
> I would handle it just like the 'Not Supported' case but with a new
> __ofono_error_network_terminated error reply. Or perhaps re-use
> __ofono_error_canceled.
In practice, I don't ever expect to send a reply since the
ussd_response_callback/ ussd_callback is invoked before the TERMINATED
notification. The error returned in the callback is __ofono_error_failed.
So, what about changing the state to 'idle' if not already set and
simply return?
Regards,
Philippe.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 16:27 [PATCH v2] call-forwarding: class applied is the class given by SS code Philippe Nunes
2012-08-23 16:27 ` [PATCH v2] ussd: Recover idle state in case of response sending failure Philippe Nunes
2012-08-23 18:03 ` Denis Kenzior
2012-08-24 9:15 ` Philippe Nunes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50374617.7050401@linux.intel.com \
--to=philippe.nunes@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox