From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: Query the status of SC facility lock
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:38:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577D25F1.7040805@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467794050-32014-1-git-send-email-slava.monich@jolla.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4475 bytes --]
Hi Slava,
On 07/06/2016 03:34 AM, Slava Monich wrote:
> Otherwise "pin" entry in LockedPins may be lost after ofono is restarted.
> ---
> src/sim.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/sim.c b/src/sim.c
> index aedc617..634acfc 100644
> --- a/src/sim.c
> +++ b/src/sim.c
> @@ -2449,58 +2449,47 @@ static void sim_free_state(struct ofono_sim *sim)
> sim_free_main_state(sim);
> }
>
> -static void sim_query_fac_imsilock_cb(const struct ofono_error *error,
> - ofono_bool_t status,
> - void *data)
> +static void sim_set_locked_pin(struct ofono_sim *sim,
> + enum ofono_sim_password_type type, gboolean locked)
> {
> - struct ofono_sim *sim = data;
> - DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> - const char *path = __ofono_atom_get_path(sim->atom);
> - char **locked_pins;
> + if (sim->locked_pins[type] != locked) {
> + char **locked_pins;
>
I'd prefer:
if (sim->locked_pins[type] == locked)
return;
.. do stuff ..
> - if (error->type != OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> - ofono_error("Querying Facility Lock for IMSI Lock failed");
> - return;
> - }
> + sim->locked_pins[type] = locked;
> + locked_pins = get_locked_pins(sim);
>
> - sim->locked_pins[OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHSIM_PIN] = status;
> + ofono_dbus_signal_array_property_changed(
> + ofono_dbus_get_connection(),
> + __ofono_atom_get_path(sim->atom),
> + OFONO_SIM_MANAGER_INTERFACE, "LockedPins",
> + DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &locked_pins);
>
> - locked_pins = get_locked_pins(sim);
> -
> - ofono_dbus_signal_array_property_changed(conn,
> - path,
> - OFONO_SIM_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
> - "LockedPins", DBUS_TYPE_STRING,
> - &locked_pins);
> + g_strfreev(locked_pins);
> + }
> +}
>
> - g_strfreev(locked_pins);
> +static void sim_query_fac_imsilock_cb(const struct ofono_error *error,
> + ofono_bool_t status, void *data)
> +{
> + if (error->type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> + sim_set_locked_pin(data, OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHSIM_PIN, status);
> + }
This is not in-line with the Linux Kernel coding style. Also, I'd prefer:
if (error->type != OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR)
return;
sim_set_locked_pin...
> }
>
> static void sim_query_fac_networklock_cb(const struct ofono_error *error,
> - ofono_bool_t status,
> - void *data)
> + ofono_bool_t status, void *data)
> {
> - struct ofono_sim *sim = data;
> - DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> - const char *path = __ofono_atom_get_path(sim->atom);
> - char **locked_pins;
> -
> - if (error->type != OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> - ofono_error("Querying Facility Lock for Network Lock failed");
> - return;
> + if (error->type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> + sim_set_locked_pin(data, OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHNET_PIN, status);
> }
> +}
as above
>
> - sim->locked_pins[OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHNET_PIN] = status;
> -
> - locked_pins = get_locked_pins(sim);
> -
> - ofono_dbus_signal_array_property_changed(conn,
> - path,
> - OFONO_SIM_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
> - "LockedPins", DBUS_TYPE_STRING,
> - &locked_pins);
> -
> - g_strfreev(locked_pins);
> +static void sim_query_fac_pinlock_cb(const struct ofono_error *error,
> + ofono_bool_t status, void *data)
> +{
> + if (error->type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> + sim_set_locked_pin(data, OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_SIM_PIN, status);
> + }
as above
> }
>
> void ofono_sim_inserted_notify(struct ofono_sim *sim, ofono_bool_t inserted)
> @@ -2529,14 +2518,19 @@ void ofono_sim_inserted_notify(struct ofono_sim *sim, ofono_bool_t inserted)
> call_state_watches(sim);
>
> if (inserted) {
> - sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> + if (sim->driver->query_facility_lock) {
> + sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHSIM_PIN,
> sim_query_fac_imsilock_cb, sim);
>
> - sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> + sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHNET_PIN,
> sim_query_fac_networklock_cb, sim);
>
> + sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> + OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_SIM_PIN,
> + sim_query_fac_pinlock_cb, sim);
> + }
> sim_initialize(sim);
Item M1 in doc/coding-style.txt.
> } else {
> sim->pin_type = OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_NONE;
>
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 8:34 [PATCH] sim: Query the status of SC facility lock Slava Monich
2016-07-06 15:38 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-06 16:02 Slava Monich
2016-07-06 16:13 ` Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577D25F1.7040805@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox