From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: designated way for modems disappearing from bus during +CFUN=1
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:09:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578675CB.5020604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160711173751.GD5250@nataraja>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3081 bytes --]
Hi Harald,
On 07/11/2016 12:37 PM, Harald Welte wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I've been struggling for quite some time to find out what is the
> designated way in ofono to deal with modems that actually perform a
> cold/warm reset (and hence USB device stack reset) when you send them an
> AT+CFUN=1 message.
The best way to deal with this is not to have the modem reset :) Does
Sierra Wireless have any extensions to turn off this behavior?
>
> Examples for this are e.g. the Sierra Wireless SL808x series of modems,
> where this behavior is documented and expected. But I'm sure there are
> others, at least I recall having seen this several times in the past.
Generally this isn't done by the modems. Some will physically power off
when you send them a CFUN=0. Then you'd need to replug the USB cable.
>
> It is somewhat logical, as a +CFUN+1 is supposed to reset _all_ of the
> status in the modem, not just the protocol stack. So the fact that most
> modems don't disappear from the bus afterwards actually means that they
> are cheating.
No, it means they are sane. Many modem manufacturers use a second
parameter to CFUN, which tells the modem whether to reset or not. E.g.
CFUN=1,1 to cause a full reset.
>
> The actual behavior of ofono with such a modem is:
>
> * modem first appears as a /wavecom_X device
> * if you issue enable_modem via dbus, the modem goes thrugh CFUN=1
> * the modem disappears from USB, ofono destroys its structures
> * the client program (e.g. the one from tests/) simply hangs and fails
> at timeout
> * the modem re-enumerates on the bus and ofono creates a new /wavecom_Y
> device, where Y != the X before the modem restart.
>
> So for an application it is not possible to continue to talk to one
> modem via dbus accross modem resets.
>
> Not issuing a +CFUN=1 is also not really an option, as then you loose
> the ability to completely disable the modem. +CFUN=4 can be used to
> force an IMSI detach and disable it from the network point of view, but
> the modem is still talking to the SIM card and will not re-read SIM
> card state if brought back online from +CFUN=4.
I know of no USB based device that provides a complete power down
setting. Some (like Ericsson) just jump off the USB bus when a CFUN=0
is issued, but it doesn't really help, as you'd need to physically take
the modem out and plug it back in. Hence we just go back to CFUN=4 mode
on disable for these devices.
Since most of these devices need to be pulled out in order to change the
SIM card, it is generally not a problem.
>
> I'm sure this issue has been seen before, and somebody must have a
> solution for it - or at least some ideas on how to solve this in a ofono
> driver plugin. I'm willing to spend some time on it, but my
> experience/exposure to the code base is limited.
This is just a limitation of USB devices. If you want proper control of
a modem power state, you might want to research devices with
full-featured modems on board.
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-13 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-11 17:37 designated way for modems disappearing from bus during +CFUN=1 Harald Welte
2016-07-12 13:02 ` Dragos Tatulea
2016-07-13 17:09 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2016-07-13 18:27 ` Harald Welte
2016-07-13 19:47 ` Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578675CB.5020604@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox