From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ubloxmodem: add the netmon driver
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:32:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <583DBBBC.50904@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480082415-30822-4-git-send-email-djalal@endocode.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11424 bytes --]
Hi Djalal,
On 11/25/2016 08:00 AM, djalal(a)endocode.com wrote:
> From: Djalal Harouni <djalal@endocode.com>
>
> This adds a netmon driver for ublox. The driver support both +COPS and
> +CESQ commands to return the previously added ofono netmon types:
>
> RSCP: Received Signal Code Power
> ECN0: Received Energy Ratio
> RSRQ: Reference Signal Received Quality
> RSRP: Reference Signal Received Power
> OPERATOR: the operator
> ---
> Makefile.am | 1 +
> drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c | 339 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 340 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index 3d7774b..07adeab 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ builtin_sources += drivers/atmodem/atutil.h \
> drivers/ubloxmodem/ubloxmodem.h \
> drivers/ubloxmodem/ubloxmodem.c \
> drivers/ubloxmodem/gprs-context.c \
> + drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c \
> drivers/ubloxmodem/lte.c
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c b/drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6b9d74f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/ubloxmodem/netmon.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
> +/*
> + *
> + * oFono - Open Source Telephony
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 EndoCode AG. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
> +#include <config.h>
> +#endif
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +
> +#include <glib.h>
> +
> +#include <ofono/log.h>
> +#include <ofono/modem.h>
> +#include <ofono/netmon.h>
> +
> +#include "gatchat.h"
> +#include "gatresult.h"
> +
> +#include "common.h"
> +#include "netreg.h"
> +#include "ubloxmodem.h"
> +#include "drivers/atmodem/vendor.h"
> +
> +static const char *cops_prefix[] = { "+COPS:", NULL };
> +static const char *cesq_prefix[] = { "+CESQ:", NULL };
> +
> +struct netmon_driver_data {
> + GAtChat *modem;
> + GAtChat *aux;
> +};
Why do you need both the modem and the aux port? I only see you using
the aux port.
> +
> +struct req_cb_data {
> + struct ofono_netmon *netmon;
> +
> + ofono_netmon_cb_t cb;
> + void *data;
> +
> + struct ofono_network_operator op;
> +
> + int rxlev; /* CESQ: Received Signal Strength Indication */
> + int ber; /* CESQ: Bit Error Rate */
> + int rscp; /* CESQ: Received Signal Code Powe */
> + int rsrp; /* CESQ: Reference Signal Received Power */
> + double ecn0; /* CESQ: Received Energy Ratio */
> + double rsrq; /* CESQ: Reference Signal Received Quality */
Why are these doubles?
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Returns the appropriate radio access technology.
> + *
> + * If we can not resolve to a specific radio access technolgy
> + * we return OFONO_NETMON_CELL_TYPE_GSM by default.
> + */
> +static int ublox_map_radio_access_technology(int tech)
> +{
> + switch (tech) {
> + case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_GSM:
> + case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_GSM_COMPACT:
> + return OFONO_NETMON_CELL_TYPE_GSM;
> + case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_UTRAN:
> + case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_UTRAN_HSDPA:
> + case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_UTRAN_HSUPA:
> + case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_UTRAN_HSDPA_HSUPA:
> + return OFONO_NETMON_CELL_TYPE_UMTS;
> + case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_EUTRAN:
> + return OFONO_NETMON_CELL_TYPE_LTE;
> + }
> +
> + return OFONO_NETMON_CELL_TYPE_GSM;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct req_cb_data *req_cb_data_new0(void *cb, void *data, void *user)
> +{
> + struct req_cb_data *ret = g_new0(struct req_cb_data, 1);
> + if (ret == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> +
> + ret->cb = cb;
> + ret->data = data;
> + ret->netmon = user;
> + ret->rxlev = -1;
> + ret->ber = -1;
> + ret->rscp = -1;
> + ret->rsrp = -1;
> + ret->ecn0 = -1;
> + ret->rsrq = -1;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static gboolean ublox_delayed_register(gpointer user_data)
> +{
> + struct ofono_netmon *netmon = user_data;
> +
> + ofono_netmon_register(netmon);
> +
> + return FALSE;
> +}
> +
> +static void cesq_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
> +{
> + enum cesq_ofono_netmon_info {
> + CESQ_RXLEV,
> + CESQ_BER,
> + CESQ_RSCP,
> + CESQ_ECN0,
> + CESQ_RSRQ,
> + CESQ_RSRP,
> + _MAX,
> + };
> +
> + struct req_cb_data *cbd = user_data;
> + struct ofono_netmon *nm = cbd->netmon;
> + struct ofono_error error;
> + GAtResultIter iter;
> + int idx, number;
> +
> + DBG("ok %d", ok);
> +
> + decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
> +
> + if (!ok) {
> + goto error;
> + }
No need for parentheses
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_init(&iter, result);
> +
> + if (!g_at_result_iter_next(&iter, "+CESQ:"))
> + return;
What happens to memory used by cbd? :)
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < _MAX; idx++) {
> +
> + ok = g_at_result_iter_next_number(&iter, &number);
> + if (!ok) {
> + DBG(" error at idx: %d", idx);
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + switch (idx) {
> + case CESQ_RXLEV:
> + cbd->rxlev = number != 99 ? number:cbd->rxlev;
> + break;
> + case CESQ_BER:
> + cbd->ber = number != 99 ? number:cbd->ber;
> + break;
> + case CESQ_RSCP:
> + cbd->rscp= number != 255 ? number:cbd->rscp;
> + break;
> + case CESQ_ECN0:
> + cbd->ecn0= number != 255 ? number:cbd->ecn0;
> + break;
> + case CESQ_RSRQ:
> + cbd->rsrq= number != 255 ? number:cbd->rsrq;
> + break;
> + case CESQ_RSRP:
> + cbd->rsrp= number != 255 ? number:cbd->rsrp;
> + break;
space before / after equal sign. See doc/coding-style.txt
> + }
> + }
> +
> + DBG(" RXLEV %d ", cbd->rxlev);
> + DBG(" BER %d ", cbd->ber);
> + DBG(" RSCP %d ", cbd->rscp);
> + DBG(" ECN0 %f ", cbd->ecn0);
> + DBG(" RSRQ %f ", cbd->rsrq);
> + DBG(" RSRP %d ", cbd->rsrp);
> +
> + ofono_netmon_serving_cell_notify(nm,
> + cbd->op.tech,
> + OFONO_NETMON_INFO_OPERATOR, cbd->op.name,
> + OFONO_NETMON_INFO_RXLEV, cbd->rxlev,
> + OFONO_NETMON_INFO_BER, cbd->ber,
> + OFONO_NETMON_INFO_RSCP, cbd->rscp,
> + OFONO_NETMON_INFO_ECN0, cbd->ecn0,
> + OFONO_NETMON_INFO_RSRQ, cbd->rsrq,
> + OFONO_NETMON_INFO_RSRP, cbd->rsrp,
> + OFONO_NETMON_INFO_INVALID);
> +
> + CALLBACK_WITH_SUCCESS(cbd->cb, cbd->data);
> + g_free(cbd);
> + return;
> +
> +error:
> + CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cbd->cb, cbd->data);
> + g_free(cbd);
> +}
> +
> +static void cops_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
> +{
> + struct req_cb_data *cbd = user_data;
> + struct ofono_netmon *nm = cbd->netmon;
> + struct netmon_driver_data *nmd = ofono_netmon_get_data(nm);
> + struct ofono_error error;
> + GAtResultIter iter;
> + int tech;
> + const char *name;
> +
> + DBG("ok %d", ok);
> +
> + decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
> +
> + if (!ok) {
> + goto error;
> + }
No need for parentheses
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_init(&iter, result);
> +
> + if (!g_at_result_iter_next(&iter, "+COPS:"))
> + return;
What happens to memory used by cbd?
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_skip_next(&iter);
> + g_at_result_iter_skip_next(&iter);
> +
> + if (g_at_result_iter_next_string(&iter, &name) == FALSE)
> + goto error;
> +
> + strncpy(cbd->op.name, name, OFONO_MAX_OPERATOR_NAME_LENGTH);
> + cbd->op.name[OFONO_MAX_OPERATOR_NAME_LENGTH] = '\0';
> +
As mentioned before, not sure string representation of the operator is
useful...
> + /* Ignored for now. TODO: maybe read format but value
> + * wouldn't be forwarder anywhere
> + */
> + cbd->op.mcc[0] = '\0';
> + cbd->op.mnc[0] = '\0';
> +
> + /* Default to GSM */
> + if (g_at_result_iter_next_number(&iter, &tech) == FALSE)
> + cbd->op.tech = ublox_map_radio_access_technology(ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_GSM);
> + else
> + cbd->op.tech = ublox_map_radio_access_technology(tech);
> +
> + if (g_at_chat_send(nmd->aux, "AT+CESQ", cesq_prefix,
> + cesq_cb, cbd, NULL)) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> +error:
> + CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cbd->cb, cbd->data);
> + g_free(cbd);
> +}
> +
> +
double empty line
> +static void ublox_netmon_request_update(struct ofono_netmon *netmon,
> + ofono_netmon_cb_t cb, void *data)
> +{
> + struct netmon_driver_data *nmd = ofono_netmon_get_data(netmon);
> + struct req_cb_data *cbd;
> +
> + DBG("ublox netmon request update");
> +
> + cbd = req_cb_data_new0(cb, data, netmon);
> + if (!cbd) {
> + CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cb, data);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (g_at_chat_send(nmd->aux, "AT+COPS?", cops_prefix,
> + cops_cb, cbd, NULL) == 0) {
You should be providing a destructor for cbd. E.g. last argument to
g_at_chat_send. Avoids memory leaks if the modem gets hot-unplugged for
example. I think some of the drivers still get this wrong when
implementing multiple-command transactions.
Might be safer to simply issue AT+COPS;+CESQ and write a single callback
that parses both responses.
> + CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cb, data);
> + g_free(cbd);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int ublox_netmon_probe(struct ofono_netmon *netmon,
> + unsigned int vendor, void *user)
> +{
> + struct netmon_driver_data *n = user;
This is evil and is going to bite you at some point. In
ofono_netmon_create inside ublox.c you pass in ublox_data. So if
someone changes this structure or ublox_data, things will explode.
> + struct netmon_driver_data *nmd;
> +
> + DBG("ublox netmon probe");
> +
> + nmd = g_try_new0(struct netmon_driver_data, 1);
> + if (nmd == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nmd->modem = g_at_chat_clone(n->modem);
> + nmd->aux = g_at_chat_clone(n->aux);
If you truly need both ports, use the g_at_chat_set_slave functionality.
> +
> + ofono_netmon_set_data(netmon, nmd);
> +
> + g_idle_add(ublox_delayed_register, netmon);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ublox_netmon_remove(struct ofono_netmon *netmon)
> +{
> + struct netmon_driver_data *nmd = ofono_netmon_get_data(netmon);
> +
> + DBG("ublox netmon remove");
> +
> + ofono_netmon_set_data(netmon, NULL);
> +
> + g_at_chat_unref(nmd->modem);
> + g_at_chat_unref(nmd->aux);
> +
> + g_free(nmd);
> +}
> +
> +static struct ofono_netmon_driver driver = {
> + .name = UBLOXMODEM,
> + .probe = ublox_netmon_probe,
> + .remove = ublox_netmon_remove,
> + .request_update = ublox_netmon_request_update,
> +};
> +
> +void ublox_netmon_init(void)
> +{
> + ofono_netmon_driver_register(&driver);
> +}
> +
> +void ublox_netmon_exit(void)
> +{
> + ofono_netmon_driver_unregister(&driver);
> +}
>
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-25 14:00 [PATCH 0/5] RFC: ubloxmodem add netmon interface djalal
2016-11-25 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] netmon: add OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR} djalal
2016-11-29 16:43 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-11-30 11:45 ` Djalal Harouni
2016-11-25 14:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] netmon: handle OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR} in D-Bus djalal
2016-11-29 16:49 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-11-30 11:48 ` Djalal Harouni
2016-11-25 14:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] ubloxmodem: add the netmon driver djalal
2016-11-29 17:32 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2016-11-30 12:05 ` Djalal Harouni
2016-11-25 14:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] ubloxmodem: intialize and register " djalal
2016-11-29 16:53 ` Denis Kenzior
2016-11-30 11:49 ` Djalal Harouni
2016-11-25 14:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] test: support OFONO_NETMON_INFO_{RSCP|ECN0|RSRQ|RSRP|OPERATOR} djalal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=583DBBBC.50904@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox