From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xmm7modem: handling of dual sim single active feature
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 21:23:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6aa0d4a3-a165-bfdb-e8aa-2bc811f06064@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553774799-18614-1-git-send-email-antara.borwankar@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6403 bytes --]
Hi Antara,
On 03/28/2019 07:06 AM, Antara Borwankar wrote:
> Handled DSSA use case for xmm7modem. Added driver function
> to switch between available card slots for SIM.
>
> Only one SIM will be active at a given time. On calling this
> function the active SIM will be removed and the card slot made
> inactive and SIM in the other card slot will be made active.
>
> Use case is similar to a SIM swap/change where one SIM is replaced
> another SIM in the same slot.
> ---
> drivers/atmodem/sim.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/atmodem/sim.c b/drivers/atmodem/sim.c
> index 5f66a09..5fdfe30 100644
> --- a/drivers/atmodem/sim.c
> +++ b/drivers/atmodem/sim.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static const char *cuad_prefix[] = { "+CUAD:", NULL };
> static const char *ccho_prefix[] = { "+CCHO:", NULL };
> static const char *crla_prefix[] = { "+CRLA:", NULL };
> static const char *cgla_prefix[] = { "+CGLA:", NULL };
> +static const char *xcmscsc_prefix[] = { "+XCMSCSC:", NULL};
> static const char *none_prefix[] = { NULL };
>
> static void append_file_path(char *buf, const unsigned char *path,
> @@ -1160,6 +1161,7 @@ static void at_pin_retries_query(struct ofono_sim *sim,
> DBG("");
>
> switch (sd->vendor) {
> + case OFONO_VENDOR_XMM:
> case OFONO_VENDOR_IFX:
> if (g_at_chat_send(sd->chat, "AT+XPINCNT", xpincnt_prefix,
> xpincnt_cb, cbd, g_free) > 0)
> @@ -1920,6 +1922,76 @@ static void at_logical_access(struct ofono_sim *sim, int session_id,
> CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cb, NULL, 0, data);
> }
>
> +static void xcmscsc_query_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user)
> +{
> + struct ofono_sim *sim = user;
> + struct sim_data *sd = ofono_sim_get_data(sim);
> + GAtResultIter iter;
> + int active_slot;
> +
> + if (!ok)
> + goto done;
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_init(&iter, result);
> +
> + if (!g_at_result_iter_next(&iter, "+XCMSCSC:"))
> + goto done;
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_skip_next(&iter);
> + g_at_result_iter_skip_next(&iter);
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_next_number(&iter, &active_slot);
> +
> + /* set active SIM slot */
> + ofono_sim_set_active_card_slot(sim, active_slot+1);
> +
> +done:
> + /* Query supported <fac>s */
> + g_at_chat_send(sd->chat, "AT+CLCK=?", clck_prefix,
> + at_clck_query_cb, sim, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void at_xcmscsc_test_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user)
> +{
> + struct ofono_sim *sim = user;
> + struct sim_data *sd = ofono_sim_get_data(sim);
> + GAtResultIter iter;
> + int card_slot_count;
> +
> + if (!ok)
> + goto done;
It seems pointless to try and query +XCMSCSC if this command failed...
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_init(&iter, result);
> +
> + if (!g_at_result_iter_next(&iter, "+XCMSCSC:"))
> + goto done;
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_skip_next(&iter);
> + g_at_result_iter_skip_next(&iter);
> +
> + if (!g_at_result_iter_open_list(&iter))
> + goto done;
> +
> + g_at_result_iter_skip_next(&iter);
> +
> + if (!g_at_result_iter_next_number(&iter, &card_slot_count))
> + goto done;
> +
> + /* Set num slots */
> + ofono_sim_set_card_slot_count(sim, card_slot_count+1);
> +
> +done:
> + /* enable reporting of MSIM remap status information
> + and enable automatic acceptance of MSIM Remap
> + acknowledgement. */
> + g_at_chat_send(sd->chat, "AT+XCMSRS=2", none_prefix,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +
> + /* Query active card slot */
> + g_at_chat_send(sd->chat, "AT+XCMSCSC?", xcmscsc_prefix,
> + xcmscsc_query_cb, sim, NULL);
e.g. these are probably only relevant on the success path. On failure
the logical thing is to skip directly to +CLCK processing
> +}
> +
> static int at_sim_probe(struct ofono_sim *sim, unsigned int vendor,
> void *data)
> {
> @@ -1938,6 +2010,14 @@ static int at_sim_probe(struct ofono_sim *sim, unsigned int vendor,
> if (at_clck_cpwd_fac[i])
> sd->passwd_type_mask |= (1 << i);
>
> + /* set default values */
> + ofono_sim_set_card_slot_count(sim, 1);
> + ofono_sim_set_active_card_slot(sim, 1);
> +
This needs to be taken care of the core. Otherwise the drivers you're
not touching are going to cause weirdness.
> + if (sd->vendor == OFONO_VENDOR_XMM)
> + return g_at_chat_send(sd->chat, "AT+XCMSCSC=?", xcmscsc_prefix,
> + at_xcmscsc_test_cb, sim, NULL) ? 0 : -1;
> +
> /* Query supported <fac>s */
> return g_at_chat_send(sd->chat, "AT+CLCK=?", clck_prefix,
> at_clck_query_cb, sim, NULL) ? 0 : -1;
> @@ -1957,6 +2037,38 @@ static void at_sim_remove(struct ofono_sim *sim)
> g_free(sd);
> }
>
> +static void xcmscsc_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result,
> + gpointer user_data)
> +{
> + struct cb_data *cbd = user_data;
> + ofono_sim_set_active_card_slot_cb_t cb = cbd->cb;
> + struct ofono_error error;
> +
> + decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
> +
> + if (cb)
> + cb(&error, cbd->data);
> +}
> +
> +static void at_set_active_card_slot(struct ofono_sim *sim, unsigned int index,
> + ofono_sim_set_active_card_slot_cb_t cb, void *data)
> +{
> + struct sim_data *sd = ofono_sim_get_data(sim);
> + struct cb_data *cbd = cb_data_new(cb, data);
> + char cmd[43];
> +
You still need to take care of returning a not implemented error in case
the vendor != VENDOR_XMM. e.g. perhaps a CME error 4 or equivalent.
> + /* Enable single SIM mode for indicated card slot id */
> + snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "AT+XCMSCSC=1,0,%u,1", index);
> +
> + if (g_at_chat_send(sd->chat, cmd, none_prefix, xcmscsc_cb,
> + cbd, g_free) > 0)
> + return;
> +
> + g_free(cbd);
> +
> + CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cb, data);
> +}
> +
> static const struct ofono_sim_driver driver = {
> .name = "atmodem",
> .probe = at_sim_probe,
> @@ -1982,7 +2094,8 @@ static const struct ofono_sim_driver driver = {
> .session_read_binary = at_session_read_binary,
> .session_read_record = at_session_read_record,
> .session_read_info = at_session_read_info,
> - .logical_access = at_logical_access
> + .logical_access = at_logical_access,
> + .set_active_card_slot = at_set_active_card_slot
> };
>
> static const struct ofono_sim_driver driver_noef = {
>
Regards,
-Denis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-29 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 12:06 [PATCH 4/5] xmm7modem: handling of dual sim single active feature Antara Borwankar
2019-03-29 2:23 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6aa0d4a3-a165-bfdb-e8aa-2bc811f06064@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox