From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7112150076484694320=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Support for samsung-ipc
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:25:16 -0500
Message-ID: <e4fd6239-e04d-32d7-cb20-2c5ce177410f@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3fa4675f-21a5-6eaf-0d2d-9f89683e902e@server.cz>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============7112150076484694320==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Tomas,

On 09/13/2017 07:45 AM, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C5=A0afa=C5=99=C3=ADk wrote:
> Hello Denis
> =

> On 09/12/2017 07:36 PM, Denis Kenzior wrote:
>>  From what I remember there was an initial RFC submission but the
>> licenses were incompatible there was no follow up after that.
> =

> I just checked COPYING in libsamsung-ipc and it is GPLv2
> =

> https://git.replicant.us/replicant/external_libsamsung-ipc/tree/COPYING
> =

> Is there still a problem including the patch?
> =


License wise it would be okay.  But someone still needs to go through =

the submission process, address feedback, etc.

Regards,
-Denis

--===============7112150076484694320==--