From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:19:55 +0300
Message-ID: <20200618071955.GE6560@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <
 <CAFA6WYOdtwnewqY0ASnMf7fyw3s_hQx0+oWJRhT3CpkkkxYpDA@mail.gmail.com>>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6922075130722585190=="
List-Id: <op-tee.lists.trustedfirmware.org>

--===============6922075130722585190==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:12:41PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 04:44, Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 07:02:37PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > + Luke
> > >
> > > Hi Jarkko,
> > >
> > > Prior to addressing your comments below which seems to show your
> > > preference for compile time selection of trust source (TPM or TEE), I
> > > would just like to hear the reasons for this preference especially if
> > > it makes distro vendor's life difficult [1] to make opinionated
> > > selection which could rather be achieved dynamically based on platform
> > > capability.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/3/405
> > >
> > > -Sumit
> >
> > Hmm... I do get the distribution kernel point. OK, lets revert to
> > dynamic then. Thanks for the remark.
> >
> > /Jarkko
> 
> Thanks, will revert to dynamic mode in v6.

Sorry about the extra trouble caused by me.

/Jarkko

--===============6922075130722585190==--