public inbox for op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys support
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 07:16:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201204051642.GA154469@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106145252.GA10434@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3825 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 04:52:52PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:02:41PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:37, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:31:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > Add support for TEE based trusted keys where TEE provides the functionality
> > > > to seal and unseal trusted keys using hardware unique key. Also, this is
> > > > an alternative in case platform doesn't possess a TPM device.
> > > >
> > > > This patch-set has been tested with OP-TEE based early TA which is already
> > > > merged in upstream [1].
> > >
> > > Is the new RPI400 computer a platform that can be used for testing
> > > patch sets like this? I've been looking for a while something ARM64
> > > based with similar convenience as Intel NUC's, and on the surface
> > > this new RPI product looks great for kernel testing purposes.
> > 
> > Here [1] is the list of supported versions of Raspberry Pi in OP-TEE.
> > The easiest approach would be to pick up a supported version or else
> > do an OP-TEE port for an unsupported one (which should involve minimal
> > effort).
> > 
> > [1] https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/devices/rpi3.html#what-versions-of-raspberry-pi-will-work
> > 
> > -Sumit
> 
> If porting is doable, then I'll just order RPI 400, and test with QEMU
> up until either I port OP-TEE myself or someone else does it.
> 
> For seldom ARM testing, RPI 400 is really convenient device with its
> boxed form factor.

I'm now a proud owner of Raspberry Pi 400 home computer :-)

I also found instructions on how to boot a custom OS from a USB stick:

https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/hardware/raspberrypi/bootmodes/msd.md

Also, my favorite build system BuildRoot has bunch of of the shelf
configs:

➜  buildroot-sgx (master) ✔ ls -1 configs | grep raspberry
raspberrypi0_defconfig
raspberrypi0w_defconfig
raspberrypi2_defconfig
raspberrypi3_64_defconfig
raspberrypi3_defconfig
raspberrypi3_qt5we_defconfig
raspberrypi4_64_defconfig
raspberrypi4_defconfig
raspberrypi_defconfig

I.e. I'm capable of compiling kernel and user space and boot it up
with it.

Further, I can select this compilation option:

BR2_TARGET_OPTEE_OS:                                                                                                                                              │  
                                                                                                                                                                     │  
   OP-TEE OS provides the secure world boot image and the trust                                                                                                      │  
   application development kit of the OP-TEE project. OP-TEE OS                                                                                                      │  
   also provides generic trusted application one can embedded                                                                                                        │  
   into its system.                                                                                                                                                  │  
                                                                                                                                                                     │  
   http://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os       

Is that what I want? If I put this all together and apply your patches,
should the expectation be that I can use trusted keys?

Please note that I had a few remarks about your patches (minor but need
to be fixed), but this version is already solid enough for testing.

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-04  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] < <CAFA6WYPetvod-Wov2n_L5TL771j+-kt+_csyWYT-uM=haEKMZQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-11-06 14:52 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys support Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-12-04  5:16   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-12-08 11:51     ` Sumit Garg
2020-11-03 16:01 Sumit Garg
2020-11-05  5:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-11-06  9:32   ` Sumit Garg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201204051642.GA154469@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox