From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] KEYS: trusted: Introduce TEE based Trusted Keys Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 20:12:10 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1486cfe8-bc30-1266-12bd-0049f2b64820@forissier.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7065769421937862895==" List-Id: --===============7065769421937862895== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 05:23:45PM +0100, Jerome Forissier wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 1/21/21 4:24 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 05:07:42PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:44:07AM +0100, Jerome Forissier wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 1/21/21 1:02 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen via OP-TEE wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:53:28PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 07:01, Jarkko Sakkinen w= rote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:32:31AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 07:35, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:47:00PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jarkko, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:05, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:31:44PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Add support for TEE based trusted keys where TEE provides the = functionality > >>>>>>>>>>>> to seal and unseal trusted keys using hardware unique key. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Refer to Documentation/tee.txt for detailed information about = TEE. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I haven't yet got QEMU environment working with aarch64, this p= roduces > >>>>>>>>>>> just a blank screen: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ./output/host/usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -cpu cortex-a= 53 -smp 1 -kernel output/images/Image -initrd output/images/rootfs.cpio -seri= al stdio > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> My BuildRoot fork for TPM and keyring testing is located over h= ere: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/buildroo= t-tpmdd.git/ > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> The "ARM version" is at this point in aarch64 branch. Over time= I will > >>>>>>>>>>> define tpmdd-x86_64 and tpmdd-aarch64 boards and everything wil= l be then > >>>>>>>>>>> in the master branch. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> To create identical images you just need to > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> $ make tpmdd_defconfig && make > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Can you check if you see anything obviously wrong? I'm eager to= test this > >>>>>>>>>>> patch set, and in bigger picture I really need to have ready to= run > >>>>>>>>>>> aarch64 environment available. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I would rather suggest you to follow steps listed here [1] as to= test > >>>>>>>>>> this feature on Qemu aarch64 we need to build firmwares such as = TF-A, > >>>>>>>>>> OP-TEE, UEFI etc. which are all integrated into OP-TEE Qemu build > >>>>>>>>>> system [2]. And then it would be easier to migrate them to your > >>>>>>>>>> buildroot environment as well. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/pipermail/op-tee/2020-May/= 000027.html > >>>>>>>>>> [2] https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/devices/qemu= .html#qemu-v8 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -Sumit > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Can you provide 'keyctl_change'? Otherwise, the steps are easy to= follow. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> $ cat keyctl_change > >>>>>>>> diff --git a/common.mk b/common.mk > >>>>>>>> index aeb7b41..663e528 100644 > >>>>>>>> --- a/common.mk > >>>>>>>> +++ b/common.mk > >>>>>>>> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ BR2_PACKAGE_OPTEE_TEST_SDK ?=3D $(OPTEE_OS_TA_= DEV_KIT_DIR) > >>>>>>>> BR2_PACKAGE_OPTEE_TEST_SITE ?=3D $(OPTEE_TEST_PATH) > >>>>>>>> BR2_PACKAGE_STRACE ?=3D y > >>>>>>>> BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_GETTY_PORT ?=3D $(if > >>>>>>>> $(CFG_NW_CONSOLE_UART),ttyAMA$(CFG_NW_CONSOLE_UART),ttyAMA0) > >>>>>>>> +BR2_PACKAGE_KEYUTILS :=3D y > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> # All BR2_* variables from the makefile or the environment are ap= pended to > >>>>>>>> # ../out-br/extra.conf. All values are quoted "..." except y and = n. > >>>>>>>> diff --git a/kconfigs/qemu.conf b/kconfigs/qemu.conf > >>>>>>>> index 368c18a..832ab74 100644 > >>>>>>>> --- a/kconfigs/qemu.conf > >>>>>>>> +++ b/kconfigs/qemu.conf > >>>>>>>> @@ -20,3 +20,5 @@ CONFIG_9P_FS=3Dy > >>>>>>>> CONFIG_9P_FS_POSIX_ACL=3Dy > >>>>>>>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=3Dy > >>>>>>>> CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIRTIO=3Dy > >>>>>>>> +CONFIG_TRUSTED_KEYS=3Dy > >>>>>>>> +CONFIG_ENCRYPTED_KEYS=3Dy > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> After I've successfully tested 2/4, I'd suggest that you roll out= one more > >>>>>>>>> version and CC the documentation patch to Elaine and Mini, and cl= early > >>>>>>>>> remark in the commit message that TEE is a standard, with a link = to the > >>>>>>>>> specification. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sure, I will roll out the next version after your testing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, I'll try this at instant, and give my feedback. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I bump into this: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> $ make run-only > >>>>>> ln -sf /home/jarkko/devel/tpm/optee/build/../out-br/images/rootfs.cp= io.gz /home/jarkko/devel/tpm/optee/build/../out/bin/ > >>>>>> ln: failed to create symbolic link '/home/jarkko/devel/tpm/optee/bui= ld/../out/bin/': No such file or directory > >>>>>> make: *** [Makefile:194: run-only] Error 1 > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Could you check if the following directory tree is built after > >>>>> executing the below command? > >>>>> > >>>>> $ make -j`nproc` > >>>>> CFG_IN_TREE_EARLY_TAS=3Dtrusted_keys/f04a0fe7-1f5d-4b9b-abf7-619b85b4= ce8c > >>>>> > >>>>> $ tree out/bin/ > >>>>> out/bin/ > >>>>> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bl1.bin -> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/= ../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu/release/bl1.bin > >>>>> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bl2.bin -> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/= ../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu/release/bl2.bin > >>>>> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bl31.bin -> > >>>>> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu/releas= e/bl31.bin > >>>>> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bl32.bin -> > >>>>> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../optee_os/out/arm/core/tee-header_v2.= bin > >>>>> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bl32_extra1.bin -> > >>>>> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../optee_os/out/arm/core/tee-pager_v2.b= in > >>>>> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bl32_extra2.bin -> > >>>>> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../optee_os/out/arm/core/tee-pageable_v= 2.bin > >>>>> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bl33.bin -> > >>>>> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../edk2/Build/ArmVirtQemuKernel-AARCH64= /RELEASE_GCC49/FV/QEMU_EFI.fd > >>>>> =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 Image -> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/..= /linux/arch/arm64/boot/Image > >>>>> =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 rootfs.cpio.gz -> > >>>>> /home/sumit/build/optee/build/../out-br/images/rootfs.cpio.gz > >>>>> > >>>>> 0 directories, 9 files > >>>>> > >>>>> -Sumit > >>>> > >>>> I actually spotted a build error that was unnoticed last time: > >>>> > >>>> make[2]: Entering directory '/home/jarkko/devel/tpm/optee/edk2/BaseToo= ls/Tests' > >>>> /bin/sh: 1: python: not found > >>>> > >>>> I'd prefer not to install Python2. It has been EOL over a year. > >>> > >>> AFAIK, everything should build fine with Python3. On my Ubuntu 20.04 > >>> machine, this is accomplished by installing package "python-is-python3" > >>> (after uninstalling "python-is-python2" if need be). > >>> > >>> $ ls -l /usr/bin/python > >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Apr 15 2020 /usr/bin/python -> python3 > >> > >> Right, just found about this in unrelated context :-) [*] > >> > >> Hope this will work out... > >> > >> [*] https://github.com/surge-synthesizer/surge/pull/3655 > >=20 > > Now I get > >=20 > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/home/jarkko/Projects/tpm/optee/edk2/BaseTools/Tests/RunTests.py"= , line 36, in > > allTests =3D GetAllTestsSuite() > > File "/home/jarkko/Projects/tpm/optee/edk2/BaseTools/Tests/RunTests.py"= , line 33, in GetAllTestsSuite > > return unittest.TestSuite([GetCTestSuite(), GetPythonTestSuite()]) > > File "/home/jarkko/Projects/tpm/optee/edk2/BaseTools/Tests/RunTests.py"= , line 25, in GetCTestSuite > > import CToolsTests > > File "/home/jarkko/Projects/tpm/optee/edk2/BaseTools/Tests/CToolsTests.= py", line 22, in > > import TianoCompress > > File "/home/jarkko/Projects/tpm/optee/edk2/BaseTools/Tests/TianoCompres= s.py", line 69, in > > TheTestSuite =3D TestTools.MakeTheTestSuite(locals()) > > File "/home/jarkko/Projects/tpm/optee/edk2/BaseTools/Tests/TestTools.py= ", line 43, in MakeTheTestSuite > > for name, item in localItems.iteritems(): > > AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'iteritems' >=20 > Right. Same here after removing all traces of Python2 from my system :-/ >=20 > A couple of fixes are needed: > 1. EDK2 needs to be upgraded to tag or later [1] > 2. The PYTHON3_ENABLE environment variable needs to be set to TRUE [2] >=20 > [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/pull/177 > [2] https://github.com/OP-TEE/build/pull/450 =20 BTW, Is to *really* impossible to test this with plain BuildRoot. It's obvious that this forks BR internally. I mean even if I get this working once, this will feels like a clumsy way to test Aarch64 regularly. I use BuildRoot extensively for x86 testing. And it would be nice to be able to start doing regular ARM testing. The mainline BuildRoot does have bunch of BR2_PACKAGE_OPTEE_* included. Are they all broken? Here's a reference where I got with that endeavour: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/X%2Fx+N0fgrzIZTeNi(a)kernel.org/ /Jarkko --===============7065769421937862895==--