From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sumit Garg To: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] optee: support restricted memory allocation Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:37:15 +0530 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20250305130634.1850178-9-jens.wiklander@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5374224803193829911==" List-Id: --===============5374224803193829911== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:04:14PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote: > Add support in the OP-TEE backend driver for restricted memory > allocation. The support is limited to only the SMC ABI and for secure > video buffers. >=20 > OP-TEE is probed for the range of restricted physical memory and a > memory pool allocator is initialized if OP-TEE have support for such > memory. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander > --- > drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 1 + > drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c > index c75fddc83576..c7fd8040480e 100644 > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c > @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ void optee_remove_common(struct optee *optee) > tee_device_unregister(optee->supp_teedev); > tee_device_unregister(optee->teedev); > =20 > + tee_device_unregister_all_dma_heaps(optee->teedev); > tee_shm_pool_free(optee->pool); > optee_supp_uninit(&optee->supp); > mutex_destroy(&optee->call_queue.mutex); > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c > index cfdae266548b..a14ff0b7d3b3 100644 > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c > @@ -1620,6 +1620,41 @@ static inline int optee_load_fw(struct platform_devi= ce *pdev, > } > #endif > =20 > +static int optee_sdp_pool_init(struct optee *optee) > +{ > + enum tee_dma_heap_id heap_id =3D TEE_DMA_HEAP_SECURE_VIDEO_PLAY; > + struct tee_rstmem_pool *pool; > + int rc; > + > + if (optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_SDP) { Is this SDP capability an ABI yet since we haven't supported it in upstream kernel? If no then can we rename it as OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_RSTMEM? > + union { > + struct arm_smccc_res smccc; > + struct optee_smc_get_sdp_config_result result; > + } res; > + > + optee->smc.invoke_fn(OPTEE_SMC_GET_SDP_CONFIG, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, > + 0, &res.smccc); > + if (res.result.status !=3D OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK) { > + pr_err("Secure Data Path service not available\n"); > + return 0; > + } > + > + pool =3D tee_rstmem_static_pool_alloc(res.result.start, > + res.result.size); > + if (IS_ERR(pool)) > + return PTR_ERR(pool); > + > + rc =3D tee_device_register_dma_heap(optee->teedev, heap_id, pool); > + if (rc) > + goto err; > + } > + > + return 0; > +err: > + pool->ops->destroy_pool(pool); > + return rc; > +} > + > static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn; > @@ -1715,7 +1750,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > optee =3D kzalloc(sizeof(*optee), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!optee) { > rc =3D -ENOMEM; > - goto err_free_pool; > + goto err_free_shm_pool; > } > =20 > optee->ops =3D &optee_ops; > @@ -1788,6 +1823,10 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > pr_info("Asynchronous notifications enabled\n"); > } > =20 > + rc =3D optee_sdp_pool_init(optee); s/optee_sdp_pool_init/optee_rstmem_pool_init/ -Sumit > + if (rc) > + goto err_notif_uninit; > + > /* > * Ensure that there are no pre-existing shm objects before enabling > * the shm cache so that there's no chance of receiving an invalid > @@ -1823,6 +1862,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > optee_disable_shm_cache(optee); > optee_smc_notif_uninit_irq(optee); > optee_unregister_devices(); > + tee_device_unregister_all_dma_heaps(optee->teedev); > err_notif_uninit: > optee_notif_uninit(optee); > err_close_ctx: > @@ -1839,7 +1879,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > tee_device_unregister(optee->teedev); > err_free_optee: > kfree(optee); > -err_free_pool: > +err_free_shm_pool: > tee_shm_pool_free(pool); > if (memremaped_shm) > memunmap(memremaped_shm); > --=20 > 2.43.0 >=20 --===============5374224803193829911==--