From: Sumit Garg via OP-TEE <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: Stauffer Thomas MTANA <Thomas.Stauffer@mt.com>,
"op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org"
<op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>,
Ferreira Joao MTANA <Joao.Ferreira@mt.com>
Subject: Re: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:12:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKa_132R8SSZHywJ@sumit-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUa44HRzwUdzjwAQbPNRM9wEt+zTJbwQW1xbvB6QzaK+TZacg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 01:10:07PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 7:09 PM Stauffer Thomas MTANA via OP-TEE
> <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running OP-TEE 4.5 with PKCS11TA and ATF lts-v2.12.4 on an iMX8MP. When I create new rsa 4096 bit keypair with OP-TEE, I often get
> >
> > rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
> >
> > from Linux 6.6.90 (mainline)
> >
> > Also PID 0 is sometimes blocked for more than 30 seconds. When I create a RT task with even higher priority, this process is also blocked up to 2 seconds. For a test I disabled saving/restoring the NS timer register in ATF (arm-trusted-firmware/lib/el3_runtime/aarch64/context_mgmt.c), this seems to get completely rid of the problem. Neither creating nor signing leads to any issue anymore. This hack may lead to other problems I do not fully understand yet. I "believe" that at least since ARMv8, the CPU have their own timers for secure/non-secure world, but I would assume that ATF implements this correctly already.
>
> I'm starting to suspect that we're setting NS_TIMER_SWITCH to 1 in
> services/spd/opteed/opteed.mk based on a misunderstanding. OP-TEE can
> use timers, but then it's using the EL3 physical timer. So OP-TEE
> should stay off the EL1 physical timer. Sumit, what's your view?
I had to research the history why I added it in the first place. It was
basically added to save and restore cntkctl_el1 register which is needed
for ftrace to work correctly. Have a look here [1]. So your current
proposed patch will break ftrace.
However, as a side effect all the EL1 physical timer registers got saved
and restored which is a problem as mentioned here. So the correct fix
here would be to make NS_TIMER_SWITCH more granular to separate out the
cntkctl_el1 register save and restore.
[1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/commit/edaf8c38f534497a65a460f0348a81d3e26b3518
-Sumit
>
> >
> > Maybe I'm completely wrong here (assuming that it cannot be I'm the first person having this issue on this platform). Hint in any direction would be helpful.
>
> I'm surprised we haven't seen more of this issue.
>
> Cheers,
> Jens
>
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Thomas
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-21 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-04 17:09 rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks Stauffer Thomas MTANA via OP-TEE
2025-08-20 11:10 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-08-20 12:39 ` Lars Persson
2025-08-20 13:13 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-08-20 13:08 ` Stauffer Thomas MTANA via OP-TEE
2025-08-20 13:50 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-08-20 14:46 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-08-21 9:19 ` Sumit Garg via OP-TEE
2025-08-20 16:04 ` Andrew Davis via OP-TEE
2025-08-21 7:08 ` Sumit Garg via OP-TEE
2025-08-21 6:42 ` Sumit Garg via OP-TEE [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKa_132R8SSZHywJ@sumit-X1 \
--to=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=Joao.Ferreira@mt.com \
--cc=Thomas.Stauffer@mt.com \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox