From: Sumit Garg via OP-TEE <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
To: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
Cc: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: fix missing shm reference cleanup in tee_ioctl_supp_recv
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 20:01:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afS5XzaeLUx1ngAl@sumit-xelite> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260429113219.88452-1-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 07:32:19PM +0800, Qihang wrote:
> params_from_user() acquires tee_shm references for MEMREF parameters and
> expects the caller to release those references with tee_shm_put() during
> cleanup.
>
> tee_ioctl_open_session(), tee_ioctl_invoke(), and
> tee_ioctl_object_invoke() all do this, but tee_ioctl_supp_recv() only
> frees the parameter array and does not drop any acquired shared-memory
> references.
>
> Fix this by using a common helper to release MEMREF references before
> freeing the parameter array, and apply it to tee_ioctl_supp_recv() as
> well.
>
> Since supp_recv backends may update num_params, preserve the original
> allocated parameter count for cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> index ef9642d72672..adad1ea8e31b 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> @@ -530,6 +530,21 @@ static int params_to_user(struct tee_ioctl_param __user *uparams,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void params_free_decref(struct tee_param *params, size_t num_params)
I would rather rename this API as free_params().
> +{
> + size_t n;
> +
> + if (!params)
> + return;
> +
> + for (n = 0; n < num_params; n++)
> + if (tee_param_is_memref(params + n) &&
> + params[n].u.memref.shm)
> + tee_shm_put(params[n].u.memref.shm);
> +
> + kfree(params);
> +}
> +
> static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx,
> struct tee_ioctl_buf_data __user *ubuf)
> {
> @@ -595,16 +610,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx,
> */
> if (rc && have_session && ctx->teedev->desc->ops->close_session)
> ctx->teedev->desc->ops->close_session(ctx, arg.session);
> -
> - if (params) {
> - /* Decrease ref count for all valid shared memory pointers */
> - for (n = 0; n < arg.num_params; n++)
> - if (tee_param_is_memref(params + n) &&
> - params[n].u.memref.shm)
> - tee_shm_put(params[n].u.memref.shm);
> - kfree(params);
> - }
> -
> + params_free_decref(params, arg.num_params);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -657,14 +663,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx,
> }
> rc = params_to_user(uparams, arg.num_params, params);
> out:
> - if (params) {
> - /* Decrease ref count for all valid shared memory pointers */
> - for (n = 0; n < arg.num_params; n++)
> - if (tee_param_is_memref(params + n) &&
> - params[n].u.memref.shm)
> - tee_shm_put(params[n].u.memref.shm);
> - kfree(params);
> - }
> + params_free_decref(params, arg.num_params);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -716,14 +715,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_object_invoke(struct tee_context *ctx,
> }
> rc = params_to_user(uparams, arg.num_params, params);
> out:
> - if (params) {
> - /* Decrease ref count for all valid shared memory pointers */
> - for (n = 0; n < arg.num_params; n++)
> - if (tee_param_is_memref(params + n) &&
> - params[n].u.memref.shm)
> - tee_shm_put(params[n].u.memref.shm);
> - kfree(params);
> - }
> + params_free_decref(params, arg.num_params);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -822,6 +814,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx,
> struct tee_iocl_supp_recv_arg __user *uarg;
> struct tee_param *params;
> u32 num_params;
> + u32 alloc_num_params;
> u32 func;
>
> if (!ctx->teedev->desc->ops->supp_recv)
> @@ -838,6 +831,8 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx,
> if (get_user(num_params, &uarg->num_params))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + alloc_num_params = num_params;
Why is this needed? Shouldn't the updated num_params will point to size
of params array?
-Sumit
> +
> if (size_add(sizeof(*uarg), TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_SIZE(num_params)) != buf.buf_len)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -861,7 +856,7 @@ static int tee_ioctl_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx,
>
> rc = params_to_supp(ctx, uarg->params, num_params, params);
> out:
> - kfree(params);
> + params_free_decref(params, alloc_num_params);
> return rc;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 3:07 [REPORT] tee: tee_ioctl_supp_recv() missing tee_shm_put() cleanup for memref params Qihang
2026-04-29 6:34 ` Jens Wiklander
2026-04-29 11:32 ` [PATCH] tee: fix missing shm reference cleanup in tee_ioctl_supp_recv Qihang
2026-05-01 14:31 ` Sumit Garg via OP-TEE [this message]
2026-05-05 15:08 ` Qihang
2026-05-05 15:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Qihang
2026-05-06 2:18 ` Qihang
2026-05-07 7:31 ` Jens Wiklander
2026-05-07 7:47 ` Jens Wiklander
2026-05-07 9:45 ` [PATCH v3] tee: fix params_from_user() error path " Qihang
2026-05-07 10:40 ` Jens Wiklander
2026-05-07 15:39 ` [PATCH v4] " Qihang
2026-05-11 13:18 ` Jens Wiklander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afS5XzaeLUx1ngAl@sumit-xelite \
--to=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox