From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.trustedfirmware.org (lists.trustedfirmware.org [18.214.241.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674C9C79F8C for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 19:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.trustedfirmware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.trustedfirmware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C910452A1 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 19:33:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.trustedfirmware.org; s=2024; t=1788723208; bh=Do2CEdD6a5aUwLTxegZNZ7rZH9H8xfi1JGY3Uv4qcvI=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:CC:List-Id:List-Archive: List-Help:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Subscribe:List-Unsubscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=Qcnjr2llbqSI7KY0LJLRW2ilf1F7MzvRLPNNqJuxGXoxKWKvlo37UFQao2c4su+l/ I5b8sDf/ZaTMMU1i9UpRQ+IgGdqrSXIoeZhwrTDC4prIdp+2dscyEpJXgw1v365Old fEfCCXinrSBRA2Awu0VU6DBSY+33AS8ak7aw5giOZImhv8eL9ctFtKkzXPcCWvEcpF W+HZ49oG19vZM5b6FYQVd8E+YC2DDmwP3+NMIlwIr9jATfvvHETQWsi5Jjtdo/Ll6Y qn8uJSGRplJYadk2zoZSFJc5zWSfXhpewUSZ4SeQmoSZ8KhGw3tKqhgJhkm7QObO9s 71LJ1+OoKYtZQ== Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) by lists.trustedfirmware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A30F42CFE for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 19:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.trustedfirmware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=UOQ+l3C3; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BB3601F9; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 19:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB2B71F00A3A; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 19:33:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788723200; bh=0kNqOTPkZp3J7RemsYmMnYNi7t0didLL0edZoqZbuyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=UOQ+l3C3lLujBRXFNmIZbndVsdbScZNJL6O1tqSdqMjmQrjL6ZYziJuWgml1fG0Sf YZjhOpebC9esQLeWBd/jXa9dy1aBOGM9VUfFMdkM1pq8Z2PBJM6ySVz5xzTC6IWHcr hUPG4TiNf0iGjXu2vtdIdxNSmSj85hQyuGO+G/8KJIYORUlSuKuQuG/X9RChqR/x9Y DsHFniEg6Ij/QnQKTcdYooZxqdcI9V1/aRc3LxVfuVuJOyhGvQIWOkfgrAxuFPAZe2 vs5e1PdKfZ70Pm/jfgXnCkSDYJMr9D6/FyFbnT3DbR7iuUbU7GjmYCz5kkL2F0VMoz puMLclabJJmcQ== Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 22:33:11 +0300 To: Vincent Donnefort Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] memblock: Introduce MEMBLOCK_LLMAP Message-ID: References: <20260902104712.2399797-1-vdonnefort@google.com> <20260902104712.2399797-2-vdonnefort@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260902104712.2399797-2-vdonnefort@google.com> X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-9.00 / 15.00]; WHITELIST_SPF_DKIM(-3.00)[kernel.org:d:+,kernel.org:s:+]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[kernel.org:dkim]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[kernel.org,quarantine]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[kernel.org:s=k20260515]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:172.105.4.254]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[18]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:63949, ipnet:172.105.0.0/19, country:SG]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[kernel.org:+] X-Rspamd-Server: lists.trustedfirmware.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9A30F42CFE X-Spamd-Bar: --------- Message-ID-Hash: TIPRFTDQKL5PCA3FCFUFT224RBLJKVCA X-Message-ID-Hash: TIPRFTDQKL5PCA3FCFUFT224RBLJKVCA X-MailFrom: rppt@kernel.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-op-tee.lists.trustedfirmware.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sudeep.holla@kernel.org, jenswi@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, sumit.garg@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, thierry.reding@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, danielmentz@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Mike Rapoport via OP-TEE Reply-To: Mike Rapoport On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 11:47:03AM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote: > Keeping last-level mappings is interesting on some architectures as it > allows mapping/unmapping pages from the kernel direct map without the > risk of splitting blocks which, under the break-before-make rule, may > trigger page-faults the kernel can't handle. > > However, mapping the entire direct map at PTE-level is costly. So > instead, create a new memblock flag MEMBLOCK_LLMAP to enable the system I believe MEMBLOCK_PTE_MAP sounds more descriptive. > to decide which region must be covered by mappings up to the last-level. > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > index d62db9e776cf..d40a5ded188d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ extern unsigned long long max_possible_pfn; > * kernel that we know is good to use. It is the only memory that > * allocations may happen from in this phase. > * @MEMBLOCK_RSRV_HUGETLB: memory is reserved for hugetlb pages > + * @MEMBLOCK_LLMAP: memory region to be mapped using last-level mapping > */ > enum memblock_flags { > MEMBLOCK_NONE = 0x0, /* No special request */ > @@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ enum memblock_flags { > MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN = 0x20, /* memory reserved for kernel use */ > MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH = 0x40, /* scratch memory for kexec handover */ > MEMBLOCK_RSRV_HUGETLB = 0x80, /* memory reserved for hugetlb pages */ > + MEMBLOCK_LLMAP = 0x100,/* last-level mapping */ > }; > > /** > @@ -160,6 +162,8 @@ int memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_reserved_mark_kern(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_mark_kho_scratch(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_clear_kho_scratch(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > +int memblock_mark_llmap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > +int memblock_clear_llmap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > > void memblock_free(void *ptr, size_t size); > void reset_all_zones_managed_pages(void); > @@ -306,6 +310,11 @@ static inline bool memblock_is_kho_scratch(struct memblock_region *m) > return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH; > } > > +static inline bool memblock_is_llmap(struct memblock_region *m) > +{ > + return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_LLMAP; > +} > + > int memblock_search_pfn_nid(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long *start_pfn, > unsigned long *end_pfn); > void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn, > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 9ce86349a29f..1591b50503ed 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -1119,6 +1119,16 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_mark_mirror(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > */ > int __init_memblock memblock_mark_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > { > + struct memblock_region *r; > + > + memblock_cap_size(base, &size); > + > + for_each_mem_region(r) { > + if (memblock_is_llmap(r) && > + memblock_addrs_overlap(base, size, r->base, r->size)) > + return -EINVAL; > + } I'm not very fond of implicit skips here. memblock has no idea what's the caller intention, maybe it actually wants to change the memory from nomap to pte-mapped. I'd rather warn in memblock_is_nomap() and memblock_is_llmap() if they both are set and let the caller deal with making sure they are not. > + > return memblock_setclr_flag(&memblock.memory, base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_NOMAP); > } > > @@ -1204,6 +1214,45 @@ __init int memblock_clear_kho_scratch(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH); > } > > +/** > + * memblock_mark_llmap - Mark a memory region with flag MEMBLOCK_LLMAP. > + * @base: the base phys addr of the region > + * @size: the size of the region > + * > + * If supported by the architecture, such region is mapped at the last-level in > + * the kernel direct map. > + * > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure. > + */ > +int __init_memblock memblock_mark_llmap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > +{ > + struct memblock_region *r; > + > + memblock_cap_size(base, &size); > + > + for_each_mem_region(r) { > + if (memblock_is_nomap(r) && > + memblock_addrs_overlap(base, size, r->base, r->size)) > + return -EINVAL; > + } same here > + > + return memblock_setclr_flag(&memblock.memory, base, size, 1, > + MEMBLOCK_LLMAP); > +} > + > +/** > + * memblock_clear_llmap - Clear flag MEMBLOCK_LLMAP for a specified region. > + * @base: the base phys addr of the region > + * @size: the size of the region > + * > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure. > + */ > +int __init_memblock memblock_clear_llmap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > +{ > + return memblock_setclr_flag(&memblock.memory, base, size, 0, > + MEMBLOCK_LLMAP); > +} > + > static bool should_skip_region(struct memblock_type *type, > struct memblock_region *m, > int nid, int flags) > @@ -2886,6 +2935,7 @@ static const char * const flagname[] = { > [ilog2(MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT)] = "RSV_NIT", > [ilog2(MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN)] = "RSV_KERN", > [ilog2(MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH)] = "KHO_SCRATCH", > + [ilog2(MEMBLOCK_LLMAP)] = "LLMAP", > }; > > static int memblock_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private) > -- > 2.55.0.970.g62bdec98f9-goog > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.