From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com (mail-wr1-f54.google.com [209.85.221.54]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.33206.1629995117175837400 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:25:17 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=YK36nn7H; spf=pass (domain: linuxfoundation.org, ip: 209.85.221.54, mailfrom: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org) Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id z4so5986976wrr.6 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:25:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IPi20Uk/BsYzJqCvMPQzM/PqESZbeYBstC7ia55q/dE=; b=YK36nn7HkFYxIf3JliUaPa+vio1Dg7aZmaderWGtyLsuRC7RI0TObCfpBRcWscn4/0 pkqVDzXtYYH7WIp7nTLKiyc/LNWy6kctwPFwQhZ4a7Q+34RpeAM6FUEmUwxCe32nL/li mRDL7UrjWrC7NYq8XkCd8yMv5IeBn8irP5Cbc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IPi20Uk/BsYzJqCvMPQzM/PqESZbeYBstC7ia55q/dE=; b=lHAUqLeZUPBSl6HjvQFD8EZtEzVTyepDugM34nmzsbxPtFS9qcuKDxJ2j8yE8hx8/4 eiTFv2nZKE+08qBFpnMYeysEsRHEHbf/uxBiNKj1eI7d7Fn5IynqRMtdizf5EX08UAL7 vPL89AD0Q130VHzAVQEQCgp4PHl1dW52FKJ3LHB3s2Ju9hhsn0YHyuNN6ynrVqr1nDio HzgH86G98QtJCXTNLjiyJOkIEysPaBJMnvDAwY1BfIOHSGaAGypbKfpaBamLKSOzPW+P wzDiL7gFtUs5YFDyDC8P7kFcblo3qYjsJE69dtVwVrqRvCFIefLpmfF3eqC9uSh44Z8o df3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531P9GLqZpbtQo4H8q2KnTxjMAqVPnlV8cGDR2jevmLgSyCPhfIr o58Os27ymcLITWSxfy6L7josXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlRTAYOS68YUmvNmmlHALbh4iBIz9bT1x8+jeQp6Yoi9RwtV2lsx1FZkCsBDwItqPFPBIEEg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f101:: with SMTP id r1mr5033000wro.355.1629995115668; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:a9d5:4a4f:480b:62d4? ([2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:a9d5:4a4f:480b:62d4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4sm3022725wmi.22.2021.08.26.09.25.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <06310ae3618ccbb469ab025784da5b023704f2f7.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] glibc: ptest: Add support for running glibc test suite with ptest From: "Richard Purdie" To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Nathan Rossi , Khem Raj , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , Adhemerval Zanella Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:25:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210826161212.12024b6b@ktm> References: <20210823150853.2817-1-lukma@denx.de> <20210823150853.2817-2-lukma@denx.de> <20210823202414.731c6749@ktm> <20210823220926.37d87121@ktm> <20210824093601.768c0c05@ktm> <34041d492af033ff34a273e07057ea9c767cabf7.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <20210824104213.6be82b74@ktm> <20210826142749.51466c70@ktm> <2beacaf42a7970cca6fce14c2200184b9d852446.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <20210826161212.12024b6b@ktm> User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.2-1build1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 16:12 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 14:27 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > > > > Do you have any more feedback regarding this patch? > > > > We're at feature freeze and this wasn't a planned change so it is too > > late for this release cycle, > > I see. Thanks for the update. > > BTW: When one can expect the Yocto/poky would accept new patches again? > > > Honister is going to be released on October 2021 [1]. After this date > this patch is going to be reconsidered? I'd expect new development to start being looked at around the time of the release, yes. > > I'm struggling with the things that were > > planned. > > I can imagine that after the "override" change a lot of attention is > necessary. > > > > > I need to spend some time looking at what the other code is doing and > > how we're using it on the autobuilder and whether we want to change > > to use the ptest approach or not. > > I see. > > > > > I added Nathan Rossi to cc since he worked on the other code for this > > and may have more insight. > > I do hope that Nathan will provide some valuable input as well, as > wrote the glibc-testsuite_%.bb recipe. If you search the commits, e.g.: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/log/?qt=grep&q=Rossi you'll see he also worked on the gcc/binutils tests I mentioned. Also, I'm not sure if you found them but these are run on our infrastructure here: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/73/builds/3877/steps/19/logs/stdio https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/42/builds/3892/steps/20/logs/stdio (one of the above uses user mode qemu iirc, the other uses system mode). We then get reports like: https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20210825-18/testresults/testresult-report.txt Cheers, Richard