From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail5.wrs.com (mail5.windriver.com [192.103.53.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80557927F for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 07:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w7H7bQiB029458 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:37:27 -0700 Received: from [128.224.162.202] (128.224.162.202) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:37:26 -0700 To: References: <1534490562-15144-1-git-send-email-hongxu.jia@windriver.com> <20180817073257.13840.94208@do.openembedded.org> From: Hongxu Jia Message-ID: <064dc928-7bbb-b537-75a4-273ecc1dfcfb@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:37:24 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180817073257.13840.94208@do.openembedded.org> Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yICJsaWJ4bWwyOiBmaXggQ1ZFLTIwMTgtOTI1MSBhbmQuLi4iIGFuZCAxIG1vcmU=?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 07:37:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US On 2018年08月17日 15:32, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: "libxml2: fix CVE-2018-9251 and..." and 1 more > Revision: 1 > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/13574/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > * Issue Upstream-Status is in incorrect format [test_upstream_status_presence_format] > Suggested fix Fix Upstream-Status format in 0001-Verify-that-we-are-not-reading-past-end-of-a-buffer.patch > Current Upstream-Status: Cherry pick from upstream bugzilla [https://bugzilla.nasm.us/show_bug.cgi?id=3392447] > Standard format Upstream-Status: > Valid status Pending, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate [reason], Submitted [where] I am not sure which one to choose, the patch is not from upstream, but its bugzilla, so `Backport' is not accurate //Hongxu > > > If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the > mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns. > Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new > version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the > version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] -> > [PATCH v3] -> ...). > > --- > Guidelines: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines > Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest > Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe >